Opinion

Wright v. Town Board of Ticonderoga

  • 158 A.D.2d 783
  • 551 N.Y.S.2d 76
  • 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 885
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Feb 1, 1990
Status
Published
Author
Kane
On the bench
Kane
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 45.4%

unsuccessfully seeking to hold town and others in contempt for failing to fire a police officer

How later courts described this case

  • unsuccessfully seeking to hold town and others in contempt for failing to fire a police officer

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Kane, J.

Petitioner appeals the denial of his application to hold respondents, the Town Board of the Town of Ticonderoga and the Director of Personnel and Civil Service of Essex County, in contempt of the order and decision of this court in Matter of Wright v Town Bd. ( 139 AD2d 60 , lv denied 73 NY2d 707 ). The nature of the alleged contempt centers around respondents’ failure to discharge Officer Dennis Johnson from his position with the Town of Ticonderoga Police Department (hereinafter Department).

The pertinent facts are contained within this court’s previous decision (supra), wherein we found, inter alia, that Johnson should be dismissed for having been appointed as a town constable in violation of Town Law § 20 (1) (b). Petitioner contends that the employment of Johnson as a police officer by the Department amounts to an intentional disregard by respondents of our previous order, which petitioner argues prohibits respondents from employing Johnson with the Department in any capacity. Supreme Court denied petitioner’s application and we affirm. Our prior decision was limited to the issue of the propriety of Johnson’s appointment as a town constable and did not prohibit respondents from appointing Johnson in some other capacity with the Department for which he may be qualified (see, Matter of Wright v Town Bd., supra, at 64-65). Accordingly, petitioner’s allegation of con *784 tempt has no merit and the application based thereon was properly denied.

Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Harvey, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.