Opinion

Wright v. Town Board of Ticonderoga

  • 132 A.D.2d 794
  • 517 N.Y.S.2d 603
  • 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49298
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Jul 9, 1987
Status
Published
Author
Levine
On the bench
Levine
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 67.3%

The opinion

Levine, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Dier, J.), entered November 28, 1986 in Essex County, which in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, dismissed the petition due to a lack of any present case or controversy.

Michael Whalen and Dennis Johnson were hired effective November 18, 1985 and November 27, 1985, respectively, to full-time positions on the Town of Ticonderoga Police Department. On September 23, 1986, petitioner commenced the instant CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking the officers’ discharge and an order compelling respondents to cease from certifying the officers’ payroll, claiming that since neither officer had completed the municipal police basic training course within six months of their appointments, they were holding permanent positions in contravention of General Municipal Law § 209-q and 9 NYCRR 6020.2 (b) (1). We now affirm Supreme Court’s dismissal of the petition.

General Municipal Law § 209-q (1) requires that a police officer complete an approved municipal police basic training program within the time period prescribed by regulations promulgated by the Governor. The relevant regulation, 9 NYCRR 6020.7 (a) and (b) provides, in relevant substance, (1) that a police officer originally appointed to a permanent position must have previously completed the basic training program prescribed elsewhere in the regulations, and (2) that an officer appointed on other than a permanent basis must complete such basic training program within one year from his appointment or forfeit his position. There is nothing in the record to substantiate petitioner’s bald assertion that Whalen and Johnson were appointed to permanent positions, and his contention that the officers were required to complete the basic program within six months of their appointment is clearly erroneous. 9 NYCRR 6020.2 (b) (1), relied upon by petitioner, requires that a police officer complete only specified core curriculum subjects within six months of the time of appointment. There is no provision in 9 NYCRR 6020.2 (b) (1) mandating forfeiture of a police officer’s position for failure to complete the core curriculum within that time period, and petitioner did not raise this objection in his petition.

*795 Since petitioner commenced the instant proceeding in September 1986, the one-year period subsequent to the officers’ appointments in November 1985, in which they must complete the basic training program, had not yet elapsed. Accordingly, Supreme Court correctly dismissed the petition on the ground that it was premature and, hence, no case or controversy existed (see, New York State Assn. of Ins. Agents v Schenck, 44 AD2d 757, 758 ).

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.