Opinion

Dune Associates v. Town Board of East Hampton

  • 91 A.D.2d 968
  • 457 N.Y.S.2d 340
  • 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16259
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Jan 3, 1983
Status
Published
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 75.8%

The opinion

— In an action to declare an amendment to the zoning ordinance of the Town of East Hampton invalid, and for an injunction preventing the town from enforcing or carrying out the amendment, defendant *969 appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), dated July 22, 1982, which, inter alia, decreed that the amendment was void. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The challenged amendment provided that for 90 days after its effective date the Planning Board of the Town of East Hampton was not to take any action on residential subdivision applications for certain areas which applications had not yet received preliminary approval. The 90-day moratorium expired by its own terms on September 13, 1982. Where, as here, any impact of the zoning amendment has already been negated, there is no longer any justiciable controversy and any opinion by this court with respect to the enactment thereof would be purely advisory. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed (see New York Public Interest Research Group v Carey, 42 NY2d 527 ). Titone, J. P., Thompson, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.