Opinion

Artis v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

  • 42 A.D.2d 557
  • 345 N.Y.S.2d 570
  • 6 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8834
  • 16 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1192
  • 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4010
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Jun 28, 1973
Status
Published
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 74.7%

The opinion

Determinations of the Division of Human Rights, dated August 30, 1971, and of Human Rights Appeal Board made August 7, 1972, unanimously annulled, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and vacated, and the matter remanded to the Division of Human Rights for hearing anew. A complaint of discriminatory discharge, by reason of race, of petitioner, a probationary reporter, was made by him and a hearing held on that complaint by the Commissioner. The latter found the complaint justified and directed rehiring for a full probationary period. However, the directive went on to order guidance and training programs for, and recruitment of minority reporters. The latter directive is ultra vires the Division’s powers, being excessive and not sufficiently related to the particular complaint. (See Executive Law, §§ 295, 297.) On appeal to the Human Rights Appeal Board, this error was compounded: instead of limiting its decision to ruling on the presence or absence or substantial supporting evidence (§ 297-a, subd. 7), the majority of the board made new findings. In addition, some of these new findings were not warranted by the original record. A new hearing with an appropriate ruling is indicated. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Steuer and Macken, JJ.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.