Opinion

Claim of Hill v. McFarland-Johnson

  • 25 A.D.2d 899
  • 269 N.Y.S.2d 217
  • 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4355
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
May 3, 1966
Status
Published
Author
Taylor
On the bench
Aulisi, Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor
Cited by
7 cases
Authority
More cited than 77.1%

The opinion

Taylor, J.

Appeal by the employer, a copartnership, and its carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board dated August 3,1965 which affirmed the decision of a Referee. The facts are not in dispute and the sole issue is whether there is substantial evidence to support the board’s finding that claimant’s accidental injuries arose out of and in the course of his employment. Claimant, a draftsman, was injured on Sunday, August 9, 1964 while driving his motor vehicle to his home from a picnic attended by 32 fellow employees and their families. A similar function had been held in 1963 and the employer had sponsored annual “ company parties ” for the preceding 12 years. Notices announcing the event had. been posted at various points on the employer’s premises. Mr. McFarland, a copartner, attended the picnic and bore substantially its entire cost, a fact of which the employees were made aware by the posting of a second notice. While attendance was not compulsory there was testimony by his superior that claimant, a relatively new employee, had been encouraged to attend the function where the opportunity would be afforded to become socially acquainted with his coemployees. We think it could be found on this record that the annual picnic, the complete cost of which the employer assumed and thereby perforce sanctioned and encouraged, had for its purpose the improvement of employee relations and the building of morale from which the employer reasonably might expect to derive some tangible benefit. The ease thus falls within our holdings in Matter of Fagan v. Albany Evening Union Co. ( 261 App. Div. 861 ); Matter of Dodge v. Wm. J. Keller, Inc. ( 279 App. Div. 959 , affd. 304 N. Y. 792 ) and Matter of Mack v. State St. Mill Bargain Center (17 A D 2d 1006). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board.

Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.