Opinion

Gelb v. Board of Elections

95 N.Y.2d 879
715 N.Y.S.2d 213
738 N.E.2d 361
2000 N.Y. LEXIS 3940

Court: New York Court of Appeals
Filed: Sep 14, 2000
Status: Published
Cited by: 4 cases
Authority: More cited than 52.0%

“[S]ummary judgment is generally inappropriate where questions of intent and state of mind are implicated.”

How later courts described this case

“[S]ummary judgment is generally inappropriate where questions of intent and state of mind are implicated.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.