Opinion

Aronsky v. Board of Education

  • 78 N.Y.2d 1057
  • 576 N.Y.S.2d 212
  • 582 N.E.2d 595
  • 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4710
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
Oct 17, 1991
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Motion, treated as a motion to extend the time to move to amend remittitur, granted; motion to amend remittitur granted, remittitur recalled and, when returned, it will be amended to read as follows:

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, particular "F” of the charges against petitioner dismissed as time barred, and the matter remitted to Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein. [See, 75 NY2d 997 .]

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.