Opinion

Schultz Management v. Board of Standards

  • 64 N.Y.2d 1057
  • 489 N.Y.S.2d 902
  • 479 N.E.2d 247
  • 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14204
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
Apr 23, 1985
Status
Published
Cited by
16 cases
Authority
More cited than 98.8%

where certificate of occupancy was issued based on misrepresentations made in a related application for an alteration permit, the certificate was properly revoked

How later courts described this case

  • where certificate of occupancy was issued based on misrepresentations made in a related application for an alteration permit, the certificate was properly revoked

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 103 AD2d 687 ).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Kane. * Taking no part: Judge Alexander.

Designated pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 2.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.