Opinion

Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals Board

  • 61 N.Y.2d 976
  • 475 N.Y.S.2d 278
  • 463 N.E.2d 619
  • 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4195
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
Mar 22, 1984
Status
Published
Cited by
60 cases
Authority
More cited than 97.9%

The opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Sullivan ( 94 AD2d 229 ). We also note that the Board found that the actual occupants of the apartment under the lease were Robert J. Castle and his wife and that the apartment was not their primary residence. That being so, Michael Castle, their son, had no right to renewal of the lease based upon section 235-f of the Real Property Law (L 1983, ch 403).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.