Opinion

Carruthers v. Board of Superintendents of the Board of Education

  • 302 N.Y. 672
  • 98 N.E.2d 479
  • 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 842
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
Mar 8, 1951
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Loijghrax, Ch. J., Lewis, Coxway and Froessel, JJ.; Desmond, Dye and Fuld, JJ., dissent in the following memorandum: Section 2520 of the Education Law limits eligibility for the position of director of the bureau of attendance to those in a lower supervisory grade in that bureau. In our view, however, it does not — and cannot constitutionally (N. Y. Const., art. V, § 6) — compel the appointing power — here the board of superintendents of the New York City board of education — to select a person who, in the reasonable judgment of the board, and based upon a proper and permissible noncompetitive examination,\is not qualified to fill such a position. Accordingly, we find no basis or warrant for an order mandating the board to make an appointment from among a group deemed by it to be unqualified. We would reverse the order and dismiss the petition.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.