Opinion

Concklin v. Hart

  • 1 Johns. Cas. 103
Court
New York Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 15, 1799
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

There appears to be a reasonable ground

for granting a commission in sucha case, and the application may be -made at any time after the commencement of the suit. (b)

Rule granted.

2 R. S. 392, § 2. Graham’s Pr. (2d ed.) 585. Mumford v. Church, infra, 147, 150, u. (a). See also, Anon. 6 Ves. Jr. 573, Sumn. ed. Rowe v__, 8 id. 262. Pritchard v. Gee, 5 Mad. 364. Pearson v. Ward, 2 Dick. 648. S. C. 1 Cox, 177. Shirley v. Earl Ferrers, 3 P. Wms. 77. Hanken v. Middleditch, 2 Brown, 640. Brydges v. Hatch, 1 Cox, 423. Botts v Verelst, 2 Dick. 454. Shelley v. 13 Ves. 57. Cholmondeley v. Oxford, 4 Bro. 156. Bellamy v. Jones, 8 Ves. 32. Fitzhugh v. Lee, Ambl. 65. See 19 Ves.. 321. Palmer v. Aylesbury, 15 Ves. 301. Sumn. ed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.