Opinion

Board of Supervisors v. Weed

  • 35 Barb. 136
  • 1861 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 140
Court
New York Supreme Court
Filed
Sep 2, 1861
Status
Published
Author
Gould
On the bench
Gould
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 79.1%

The opinion

By the Court, Gould, J.

It was held in The Chemung Canal Bank v. The Board of Supervisors of Chemung County, ( 5 Denio, 517, 523, 4 ,) that a board of supervisors cannot draw bills of exchange; but can merely certify the evidence of the audit, or resolution, of the board. Of course a committee of the board cannot do what the board could not.

' This, therefore, is no draft, in the sense of being commercial paper; and the taker of it is bound, (like the taker of a chose in action not negotiable,) by all the equities to which it was liable in the hands of the person transferring it to him.

In this case Flood was bound by Main’s knowledge of Hamblin’s equities. This being so, there can be no doubt that the judge, at the circuit, drew the correct legal conclusions from the facts he found. And I see no way in which we can say that there is not evidence sufficient to support the findings of fact.

It would seem that the judgment of the circuit must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Wright, Gould and Hogeboom, Justices.]

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.