Opinion

Peachey v. Board of Supervisors

  • 59 Cal. 548
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 15, 1881
Status
Published
Author
Morrison
On the bench
Morrison
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 85.0%

The opinion

Morrison, C. J.:

Application for a writ of mandamus to compel the defendants, Supervisors of the county of Calaveras, to fix relator’s salary, and to allow his claim for services rendered by him as Superintendent of Schools, in and for the county of Calaveras.

There is but one question in the case, and that is the following: Is Section 1552 of the Political Code applicable to the Superintendent of Schools of Calaveras county? If it is, it- is conceded that a peremptory writ of mandamus should issue in the case.

It is claimed, however, that Section 1552 of the Political Code does not apply to such Superintendent, because that section was repealed as to him by a special Act of the Legislature, approved March 9,1878. (Stats. 1877-8, p. 204.) On *550 that day the Legislature passed an Act fixing the salary of the Superintendent of Public Schools in Calaveras county at five hundred dollars per annum, and it was therein provided that “this Act shall take effect and be in force on and after the first Monday of March, A. D. eighteen hundred and eighty.”

The new Constitution went into effect on the first day of January, 1880, and by Section 1, Article xxii thereof, it is provided that “all laws in force at the adoption of this Constitution not inconsistent therewith, shall remain in full force and effect until altered or repealed by the Legislature,” etc.

The special Act above referred to was not, according to its terms, to go into force and effect until the first Monday of March, 1880; but Section 1552 of the Political Code was in full force and effect on the first day of January, 1880, and the Act of March 9,1878, never went into effect. It follows, therefore, that it was that section of the statute, and not the special Act of 1878, that was continued in full force and effect by Section 1, Article xxii of the Constitution.

It was, therefore, the duty of the Board of Supervisors of Calaveras county to “estimate and allow” the relator’s salary.

Let a peremptory writ of mandamus issue, as prayed for.

Sharpstein and Thornton, JJ., concurred.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.