Opinion

Brown v. Harter

  • 18 Cal. 76
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Jul 1, 1861
Status
Published
Author
Baldwin
On the bench
Baldwin
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 90.3%

The opinion

Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field C. J. and Cope, J. concurring.

The points on this appeal are merely technical. They have *77 either been decided heretofore or are not of difficulty. The only one we think it necessary to notice is the refusal to permit the non-suit after the jury had retired. Some obscurity possibly exists in the opinion in Hancock Ditch Co. v. Bradford, ( 13 Cal. 637 ) in the definition of the word “ trial,” as used in the one hundred and forty-eighth section of the Practice Act; but the expressions used are explained in the subsequent portions of the opinion.

The Practice Act does not give an arbitrary right to become nonsuit after the case has been finally submitted to the jury, though it exists at any time before such final submission and their retirement.

Judgment affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.