Opinion

Podmore v. South Brooklyn Savings Institution

  • 27 Misc. 120
  • 57 N.Y.S. 406
Court
New York Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 15, 1899
Status
Published
Author
Giegerich
On the bench
Giegerich
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 25.3%

The opinion

Giegerich, J.

In view of the affidavits filed in support of the plaintiff’s proceedings in the Surrogate’s Court, I am inclined to believe that the action is prosecuted with a reasonable prospect of success; and that a substantial issue exists as to the validity of the payment made by defendant in recognition of the claim of a gift causa mortis. It appears that the plaintiff has brought the action in good faith, and, under the authorities, the fact that the estate is without assets is not alone sufficient to call for an order for security for costs. Rutherford v. Town of Madrid, 77 Hun, 545 ; Hale v. Mason, 86 id. 499; Brown v. Dean, 83 id. 613; Fagan v. Strong, 19 Civ. Pro. 88; 7 N. Y. Supp. 919 ; Sullivan v. McManus, N. Y. Law Jour., Nov. 1, 1894; Ridgway v. Symons, 14 Misc. Rep. 78 ; Cahn v. Sugenheimer, N. Y. Law Jour., April 4, 1899. For these reasons, the motion to compel the administrator to give security for costs is denied.

Motion denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.