Opinion

Cusberth v. Board of Standards & Appeals

  • 274 A.D. 912
  • 83 N.Y.S.2d 258
  • 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4013
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Nov 1, 1948
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

We cannot agree with the contention of the petitioners-respondents that section 7-A of the New York City Zoning Resolution did not apply to the proposed alteration. In any event their application for a variance was made under that section. It is clear that there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the board of standards and appeals in denying a variance on the facts presented.

The orders appealed from should be reversed and the petition dismissed, with costs and disbursements to appellants.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ., concur.

Orders unanimously reversed and the petition dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.