Opinion

Russell v. Mariani

  • 894 F.2d 1337
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1258
  • 1990 WL 6884
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
Jan 31, 1990
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.6%

The opinion

894 F.2d 1337

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

Victor J. RUSSELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Samuel MARIANI, Parole Officer; John Doe, Unit Supervisor;

Raymond E. Capots, Chairman, Adult Parole Authority;

Richard P. Seiter, Director, Department of Rehabilitation

and Corrections; Richard Celeste, Governor, of Ohio,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-3424.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 31, 1990.

Before MILBURN and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and the briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

2

Victor J. Russell appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . Russell alleged that the defendant parole officer gave misleading testimony during a pretrial hearing with the result that Russell was deprived of his right to a speedy trial on the underlying criminal charge. Upon consideration, we conclude that the complaint was properly dismissed.

3

Clearly, witnesses in judicial proceedings enjoy absolute immunity from suit for damages under section 1983 for claims arising from their testimony. Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983); Alioto v. City of Shively, 835 F.2d 1173, 1174 (6th Cir.1987). Plaintiff's attempts to distinguish this complaint are patently frivolous. Defendant was properly accorded absolute immunity from suit based upon the acts alleged.

4

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.