Opinion

Brown v. City of Cottleville

442 S.W.3d 138
2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 702
2014 WL 2883504

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Filed: Jun 24, 2014
Status: Published
On the bench: Amburg, Cohen, Richter
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employer City of Cottleville, Missouri, (“Cottleville”) appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) determining that employee *139 Chad Brown is eligible for unemployment benefits. The Commission rejected Cot-tleville’s claim that Brown was terminated for misconduct connected to work. We affirm the Commission’s order.

No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.