Opinion

Brown-Forman Corporation v. Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission

  • 883 F.2d 504
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 13189
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
Aug 31, 1989
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.4%

The opinion

883 F.2d 504

BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

TENNESSEE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION, et al.,

Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 87-5870, 87-5913.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 31, 1989.

1

Robert L. DeLaney, Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Jane P. North, and Michael J. Passino, Passino, DeLaney and Hildebrand, W.J. Michael Cody, Atty. Gen., William Barry Turner, Asst. U.S. Atty., Nashville, Tenn., for defendants-appellants.

2

L. Webb Campbell, Dearborn & Ewing, and Robert L. Echols, Nashville, Tenn., for plaintiff-appellee.

3

Prior report: 109 S.Ct. 3208 .

ORDER

4

Before KRUPANSKY and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and HACKETT, District Judge. *

5

ON REMAND FROM the Supreme Court of the United States of America.

6

UPON CONSIDERATION of the decision of that Court vacating the prior decision of this court, it is ordered that this cause be REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings in light of Healy v. The Beer Institute, Inc., 491 U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 2491 , 105 L.Ed.2d 275 (1989).

*

The Honorable Barbara Hackett, United States District Judge, Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.