Opinion

Brown v. Leary

  • 100 A.D. 421
  • 91 N.Y.S. 463
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Jan 15, 1905
Status
Published
Author
Laughlin
On the bench
Laughlin
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 68.3%

The opinion

Laughlin, J,:

The practice in this case was irregular. . There should have been a decision directing the interlocutory judgment,'but instead there is ■merely an order.- The order, even if it 'could- be treated as a decision, is not appealable. The appeal should be from, the interlocutory judgment only.

The plaintiff’s assignor transferred real estate and other ..property • to the defendant as security for loans. It is alleged in the complaint that the defendant subsequently asserted absolute title tó the pléd'géd property aiid judgment is demanded for the value of the property over and above the amount of the loans on the theory that the assertion of title was a conversion and that it gave the owner an election to treat the transfers as. sales. The demurrer was upon the ground that the complaint failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. There is no allegation that the pledgee disposed of any of the property, nor is there any allegation of a tender - of the, amount of the loans and interest and' demand for the return of the property. The pledgee was entitled to the possession of the'property until the same was redeemed, and the, mere assertion of title was not sufficient to constitute a conversion even as to the personal, property and of course there could be no conversion as to the realty. *423 Nor did the mere assertion of title give the plaintiff the election to treat the transfers as sales and recover the value of the pledged property over and above the amount of the loans.

It follows that the appeal from the order should be dismissed, with ten dollars costs, and the interlocutory judgment should be reversed, with costs, and tlie demurrer sustained? with costs, but with leave to plaintiff to amend upon payment of the costs of the appeal and of the demurrer.

Van Brunt, P. J., Patterson, Ingraham and McLaughlin, JJ., concurred.

Appeal from order dismissed, with ten dollars costs. Judgment reversed, with costs, and demurrer sustained, with costs, with leave to plaintiff to amend on payment of costs in this court and in the court below.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.