Opinion

Opinion

  • 866 F.2d 1415
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Feb 23, 1989
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

866 F.2d 1415

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles Davis BURRELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee,

and

Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Corrections, State

Penitentiary, Lieutenant Governor Douglas Wilder, Vivian

Watts, Secretary of Public Safety, John W. Williams, III,

Chairman, Board of Corrections, Edward W. Murray, Director,

Virginia Department of Corrections, Toni V. Bair, Reg.

Admin., Virginia Department of Corrections, Raymond Muncy,

Warden, Virginia State Penitentiary, Phyllis Katz, Director,

Employee Relations Counselors, Maya Hasagawa, Supervisor,

Employee Relations Counselor, Duncan Brogan, Mail Clerk,

Department of Corrections Headquarters, Mary Sue Terry,

Attorney General of Virginia, Malcolm Glenn, Capt. Willie

Young, Capt. Dan Barker, Charles E. Brown, Defendants.

No. 88-3595.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 12, 1988.

Decided: Jan. 30, 1989.

Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Feb. 23, 1989.

Charles Davis Burrell, appellant pro se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Cleo Elaine Powell, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellee.

Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Charles Davis Burrell appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Burrell v. Virginia Dept. of Corrections, C/A No. 88-30-R (E.D.Va. May 5, 1988; July 12, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

2

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.