Opinion

Stansbury, Pamela v. Federal Exprress Corp.

  • 2021 TN WC 257
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Dec 20, 2021
Status
Published
On the bench
Dale Tipps
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Dec 20, 2021

12:52 PM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MEMPHIS

PAMELA STANSBURY, ) Docket No.: 2021-08-0423

Employee, )

v. )

)

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP., ) State File No.: 69937-2020

Employer, )

And )

)

ABIGAIL HUDGENS, Admin. of ) Judge Dale Tipps

SUBSEQUENT INJURY )

FUND FOR THE TENN. )

BUREAU OF WORKERS’ )

COMPENSATION. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

DENYING BENEFITS

The Court held an Expedited Hearing on December 14, 2021, to determine whether

Ms. Stansbury is likely to prove at a hearing on the merits that she is entitled to additional

medical and temporary disability benefits. Although all agreed that Ms. Stansbury suffered

a compensable head injury, the Court holds that she did not meet her burden for the

requested benefits and denies them at this time.

History of Claim

While working at FedEx, Ms. Stansbury was struck in the head on October 21, 2020.

FedEx provided a panel of physicians, from which she selected Dr. Alan Nadel.

Dr. Nadel diagnosed a mild posttraumatic headache, prescribed medication, and

took Ms. Stansbury off work. After seeing her several times, he released her with no work

restrictions on April 1, 2021, finding that nothing suggested any residual neurologic

problems.

FedEx made temporary total disability payments from the date of injury until Dr.

Nadel released her to return to work. However, due to the pandemic and transportation

problems, Ms. Stansbury was unable to cash or deposit several of the temporary disability

checks. The parties announced an agreement at the start of the hearing that FedEx would

examine its payment records and reissue any disability benefits that had not been cashed

or deposited.

In addition to the temporary disability benefit issue, Ms. Stansbury also sought

payment of medical expenses she says she incurred for emergency treatment before FedEx

offered her a panel. Further, she expressed dissatisfaction with Dr. Nadel’s treatment.

FedEx contended that it has provided all the medical treatment and disability

payments to which Ms. Stansbury is entitled. It argued that Ms. Stansbury did not present

any evidence supporting her claim for additional benefits or a different medical provider.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

For the Court to grant Ms. Stansbury’s requests, she must prove she is likely to

prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2021); McCord

v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9

(Mar. 27, 2015). FedEx does not contest the compensability of her injury. Therefore, the

question is whether she is likely to show she is entitled to the additional requested benefits.

Medical Benefits

Ms. Stansbury requested additional medical treatment and payment of past medical

expenses.

Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(1)(A) provides that the employer

shall furnish, free of charge to the employee, medical treatment made reasonably necessary

by the accident. Further, the employer shall designate a group of three or more independent

reputable physicians, from which the employee shall select one to be the treating physician.

Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)(i).

Ms. Stansbury selected Dr. Nadel from a panel, and FedEx authorized treatment

with him for several months. She offered no proof that FedEx ever refused to authorize a

return to Dr. Nadel or that he refused to see Ms. Stansbury after he released her. Further,

although Ms. Stansbury was dissatisfied with Dr. Nadel’s treatment and felt she would

have done better with another doctor, she has not offered medical proof or identified any

legal basis that would justify an order changing her authorized physician.1

1

Ms. Stansbury was very frustrated about her inability to get copies of Dr. Nadel’s records, either from him

or from FedEx, and she characterized this as a coverup. While the Court is sympathetic, it has no remedy

Regarding the medical expenses, in certain circumstances an employer might be

held responsible for medical benefits obtained from a medical provider of the employee’s

choice. See McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

LEXIS 6, at *13 (Mar. 27, 2015). However, Ms. Stansbury stated in her petition that she

received a panel of physicians “around October 28,” or about a week after the accident.

She presented no proof that FedEx knew of her need for emergency room treatment or

failed to provide it. Without that evidence, the Court cannot order FedEx to pay for her

unauthorized treatment.

For these reasons, Ms. Stansbury has not proven she is likely to prevail on her claims

for additional medical benefits.

Temporary Disability Benefits

To receive temporary total disability benefits, Ms. Stansbury must prove (1) she

became disabled from working due to a compensable injury; (2) a causal connection

between her injury and her inability to work; and (3) her period of disability. For temporary

partial disability benefits, she must show that her treating physician returned her to work

with restrictions that FedEx either could not or would not accommodate. See Jones v.

Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7, 8 (Dec. 11,

2015).

Beginning with the first category of benefits, the only medical opinion is Dr. Nadel’s

conclusion that Ms. Stansbury was unable to work after the injury until March 31, 2021.

FedEx has paid temporary disability benefits for that entire period (or will pay under the

parties’ agreement). As to temporary partial disability, Ms. Stansbury offered no medical

evidence of any work restrictions. Therefore, she is not likely to prove entitlement to

additional temporary disability benefits.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Ms. Stansbury’s claims against FedEx for additional benefits are denied at this time.

2. This case is set for a Scheduling Hearing on March 9, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. You must

call toll-free at 855-874-0473 to participate. Failure to call might result in a

determination of the issues without your further participation. All conferences are

set using Central Time.

ENTERED December 20, 2021.

available under the current posture of the case.

_____________________________________

Judge Dale Tipps

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Ms. Stansbury’s Rule 72 Declaration Under Penalty of Perjury

2. Wage Statement

3. Dr. Nadel’s treatment notes

4. Dr. Nadel’s Form C-30A (identification only)

5. EMT records

6. October 29, 2020 LaBonheur record (identification only)

7. Methodist Minor Medical record (identification only)

8. October 29, 2020 St. Francis record (identification only)

9. October 29, 2020 emergency room discharge record

10. October 29, 2020 St. Francis Final Report (identification only)

11. Emergency discharge instructions (identification only)

12. Records from Church Health (identification only)

13. Petition for Benefit Determination

Technical record:

1. Petition for Benefit Determination

2. Dispute Certification Notice

3. Request for Expedited Hearing

4. FedEx’s Pre-Hearing Brief

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was sent as indicated on

December 20, 2021.

Name Certified Via Via Service sent to:

Mail Fax Email

Pamela Stansbury X X Pstans20@gmail.com

Stephen Miller, X smiller@mckuhn.com

Employer’s Attorney

Timothy Kellum, X Timothy.kellum@tn.gov

SIVRF Attorney

______________________________________

PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the

Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the

date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must

serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of

the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file

it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both

parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’

Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof

concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be

a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten

business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The

party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business

days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a

statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the

expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of

the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an

argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.: ________________________

State File No.: ______________________

Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________

Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-

stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):

□ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________

□ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________

issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________

Email: __________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________

Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________

Email: _________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________

Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

______________________________________________

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.