Opinion

Leroy Griffin v. Curtis Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Oct 1, 2021
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7178

LEROY ANTHONY GRIFFIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CURTIS BROWN; NARDIA PRESSLEY; MYKIRA PRESLEY; SARAH

THACKER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.

Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (4:19-cv-00106-HMH)

Submitted: August 26, 2021 Decided: October 1, 2021

Before WYNN, DIAZ, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leroy Anthony Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur, III, AIKEN, BRIDGES,

ELLIOTT, TYLER & SALEEBY, PA, Florence, South Carolina; Mark Victor Gende,

William Alexander Neinast, SWEENY, WINGATE & BARROW, PA, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Leroy Anthony Griffin appeals the district court’s order accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Griffin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Griffin v. Brown, No. 4:19-cv-00106-

HMH (D.S.C. July 30, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.