Opinion

Hemphill Contracting Co. v. Board of Adjustment

  • 810 S.W.2d 517
  • 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 264
  • 1991 WL 22327
Court
Missouri Court of Appeals
Filed
Feb 26, 1991
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

*518 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s order which found plaintiff did not present sufficient evidence to establish nonconforming use.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.