Opinion

Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

  • 763 A.2d 369
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Nov 29, 2000
Status
Published
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 51.7%

to provide meaningful basis for appellate review, the WCJ’s decision must contain all necessary findings and rationale for the decision

How later courts described this case

  • to provide meaningful basis for appellate review, the WCJ’s decision must contain all necessary findings and rationale for the decision

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

*370

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue:

Whether the WCAB and the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the termination of petitioner’s disability benefits because the WCJ failed to adequately explain on the record why she rejected conflicting, competent medical evidence pursuant to section 422(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act?

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.