Opinion

Wine v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

  • 675 A.2d 1381
  • 1995 D.C. App. LEXIS 295
  • 1995 WL 861071
Court
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Filed
Oct 24, 1995
Status
Published
Author
Newman
On the bench
Ferren, King, Newman
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 19.5%

The opinion

NEWMAN, Senior Judge:

Wine argues that the decision of the Board ordering his involuntary retirement based on non-service related disability lacks the requisite evidentiary support. We affirm.

The proceedings of the Board are set forth in its brief; we incorporate the same herein. On this record, there is sufficient evidence to support the Board’s holding that there was not a full time light duty job petitioner was capable of performing. Thus, based on the teachings of Price v. Police & Firefighters Retirement and Relief Bd., 542 A.2d 1249 (D.C.1988), we must affirm.

Accordingly, the decision appealed from herein is hereby affirmed.

So ordered.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.