Opinion

Dunham v. Felt

  • 65 Me. 218
  • 1876 Me. LEXIS 48
Court
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Filed
May 5, 1876
Status
Published
Author
Walton
On the bench
Appleton, Barrows, Danforth, Peters, Virgin, Walton
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Walton, J.

This is an action on a poor debtor’s bond. One of the questions argued is whether the bond is a valid statute bond, or a bond good only at common law. We do not find it necessary to determine this question; for whether the bond be regarded as a statute bond, or a bond good only at common law, the certificate of the justices introduced in defense, was prima facie evidence that one of its alternative conditions had been performed; and no evidence being offered by the plaintiff to control its prima facie force, it constituted a full and complete bar to the action. Such in effect was the ruling of the presiding judge at nisiprius. We think the ruling was correct. Smith v. Brown, 61 Maine, 70. Ayer v. Fowler, 30 Maine, 347. Bachelder v. Sanborn, 34 Maine, 230. Exceptions overruled.

Judgment for defendants.

Appleton, C. J., Barrows, Danforth, Virgin and Peters, JJ., concurred.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.