Opinion

Hopson, Cecilia v. Travelers Property Cas. Corp.

  • 2021 TN WC 221
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Aug 31, 2021
Status
Published
On the bench
Deana C. Seymour
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Aug 31, 2021

07:00 AM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MEMPHIS

CECILIA HOPSON, ) Docket No. 2021-08-0074

Employee, )

v. )

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CAS. ) State File No. 76850-2014

CORP., )

Employer, )

And )

NEW HAMPSHIRE INS. CO., ) Judge Deana Seymour

Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

The Court held an Expedited Hearing on August 18, 2021, to determine Cecilia

Hopson’s entitlement to medical benefits. 1 Travelers contended her claim was barred by

the statute of limitations and that it paid all benefits to which she is entitled. The Court

finds that Ms. Hopson is unlikely to prove at a hearing on the merits that she timely filed

her claim and denies her request for medical benefits.

History of Claim

Ms. Hopson claimed injuries after an automobile accident at work on September

24, 2014. After reporting the accident, she received authorized treatment for headaches

and neck and back pain from multiple physicians.

These physicians treated Ms. Hopson conservatively and placed her at maximum

medical improvement from an orthopedic, neurologic, and neurosurgical standpoint. Dr.

Glenn Crosby, Ms. Hopson’s neurosurgeon, determined that she was not a surgical

candidate. Dr. Bola Adamolekun, one of Ms. Hopson’s neurologists, noted that he could

not relate her symptoms to her work accident.

1

The issue of temporary disability benefits was added to the Dispute Certification Notice. However, Ms.

Hopson testified that she was not seeking disability benefits, as she continued to work while treating for

her work injuries.

1

After her release from Dr. Adamolekun on December 6, 2018, Ms. Hopson

requested additional medical treatment from Travelers. However, based on Dr.

Adamolekun’s causation opinion, Travelers denied the request. Ms. Hopson filed a

Petition for Benefit Determination on January 20, 2021, seeking medical benefits.

At the hearing, Ms. Hopson argued that Travelers wrongfully denied treatment.

Since that time, she has continued to treat on her own and seeks reimbursement for that

treatment as well as ongoing medical care. However, she did not introduce medical bills

into evidence, and she only submitted a couple of medical records related to this

treatment.

During cross examination, Ms. Hopson confirmed that she filed her Petition for

Benefit Determination on January 20, 2021. Ms. Hopson testified that representatives of

the Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation told her that she “still had time because

. . . Travelers had just . . . paid a last bill or something and that [she] had time to file the

petition if [she] wanted to do so.” According to Ms. Hopson, she “was following what

[she] believed to be true and correct information from the state in terms of being able to

file the petition that [she] had time.”

Travelers argued that Ms. Hopson’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations.

Claim representative Allison Rountree testified that the last payment on the claim was

made on December 21, 2018. Since Ms. Hopson filed her petition more than one year

after that date, Travelers argued her claim was barred. On cross examination, Ms.

Rountree admitted that Travelers filed a form with the Bureau on January 2, 2020, but

she testified she was not familiar with the form.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Ms. Hopson must provide sufficient evidence from which the Court can determine

she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. McCord v. Advantage Human

Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

Under the Workers’ Compensation Law, in cases where the employer voluntarily

pays benefits, an employee’s right to recover compensation is forever barred unless the

employee files a Petition for Benefit Determination within one year of either the date of

the last authorized treatment or the time the employer ceased to make payments. See

Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203(b)(2) (2020). Here, Ms. Hopson filed her Petition for

Benefit Determination on January 20, 2021, which was more than one year after the last

benefit payment on December 21, 2018. Thus, she did not file within the one-year statute

of limitations.

Ms. Hopson claimed a representative with the Bureau told her she had a year from

Travelers’ January 2020 electronic filing to file her petition. Through Ms. Rountree’s

testimony on cross examination, Ms. Hobson established that Travelers made an

2

electronic filing on January 2, 2020. However, it is not clear what form was filed or how

it would excuse her failure to timely file her Petition for Benefit Determination.

Moreover, she ultimately filed her petition more than a year after January 2, 2020.

Ms. Hopson represented herself, as is her right. However, the Court cannot excuse

noncompliance with the substantive and procedural rules that represented parties must

observe. Walton v. Averitt Express, Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 37, at *5

(June 2, 2017). Because she did not file within one year of the last payment, the Court

must hold that Ms. Hopson is not likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. The Court denies Ms. Hopson’s request for benefits at this time.

2. This case is set for a Scheduling Hearing on October 11, 2021 at 8:30 a.m.

Central Time. You must call 615-532-9550 or toll-free at 866-943-0014 to

participate in the Hearing. Failure to call might result in a determination of the

issues without your participation.

ENTERED August 31, 2021.

____________________________________

Judge Deana C. Seymour

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

Technical Record

1. Petition for Benefit Determination

2. Dispute Certification Notice

3. Request for Expedited Hearing, with Ms. Hopson’s Affidavit

4. Employer’s Pre-Expedited Hearing Brief

5. Employer’s Motion for Permission to Appear Remotely for Expedited Hearing

6. Order on Employer’s Motion for Permission to Appear Remotely for Expedited

Hearing

Exhibits

1. Documents filed with the mediator by Employee (TNComp Doc ID 55543)

2. Dr. Bola Adamolekun’s medical records

3. Dr. Stephen Gipson’s medical records

4. Dr. Glenn Crosby’s medical records

5. Dr. Alan Kraus’s medical records

6. Dr. Feiyu Chen’s medical records

7. Dr. Samuel Murrell’s medical records

8. Notice of Controversy

9. Petition for Benefit Determination

3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on August 30, 2021.

Name Certified First Email Service sent to:

Mail Class

Mail

Cecilia Hopson, X X X 9432 Mary Tucker Cove

Employee Memphis, TN 38133

chopson21@comcast.net

Emily Faulkner, X emily.faulkner@mgclaw.com

Employer’s Attorney

_____________________________

Penny Shrum, Court Clerk

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

5

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.: ________________________

State File No.: ______________________

Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________

Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-

stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):

□ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________

□ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________

issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________

Email: __________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________

Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________

Email: _________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________

Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

______________________________________________

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.