Opinion

Bendy v. James Boyce & Co.

  • 37 Tex. 443
Court
Texas Supreme Court
Filed
Jul 1, 1873
Status
Published
Author
Ogden
On the bench
Ogden
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 90.5%

The opinion

Ogden, J.

The citations in each of these causes are defective in not containing the names of all the defendants. (Johnson v. Brown, 16 Texas, 554 ; Battle v. Eddy, 31 Texas, 368 ; Portwood v. Wilburn, 33 Texas, 715 .) And the plaintiff below could not cure the defect by dismissing as to one of the parties. The return of the sheriff, that he “ Executed by serv “ ing H. B. Bendy with a copy, etc.,” is not a compliance with the requirements of the statute. (Thomason v. Bishop, 24 Texas, 302 ; Willie v. Thomas, 22 Texas, 175 ; Graves v. Robertson, 22 Texas, 130 .) Under the defective citation and defective service, judgment was taken by default in each cause, and the defendant Bendy has sued out writs of error. For the defects in the citations and the sheriff’s return, the court below had no such jurisdiction of the person of the plaintiff in error, as would authorize a judgment by default. The judgment in each case is .therefore reversed, and the causes remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.