Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 86 So. 3d 569
  • 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6482
  • 2012 WL 1415444
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Apr 25, 2012
Status
Published
On the bench
Larose, Northcutt, Wallace
Cited by
7 cases
Authority
More cited than 64.6%

holding courts may “reverse convictions [of aggravated battery] when the State fails to present competent substantial evidence that the object used is a deadly weapon”

How later courts described this case

  • holding courts may “reverse convictions [of aggravated battery] when the State fails to present competent substantial evidence that the object used is a deadly weapon”
  • “A deadly weapon is defined as an instrument that will likely cause death or great bodily harm when used in the ordinary and usual manner contemplated by its design.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice to William Brown’s right, if any, to file a timely motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

NORTHCUTT, WALLACE, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.