Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 127 So. 3d 831
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18919
  • 2013 WL 6224033
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Nov 27, 2013
Status
Published
On the bench
Emas, Lagoa, Rothenberg
Cited by
12 cases
Authority
More cited than 89.6%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion Appellant’s adjudications and sentences following his probation revocation hearing. However, the trial court failed to reduce to writing its oral pronouncement of the -violations and revocation of Appellant’s probation. We therefore remand this cause to the trial court for entry of a written order of revocation of probation which, consistent with its oral pronouncement at the hearing, sets forth the conditions of probation that Appellant violated. See Daniels v. State, 45 So.3d 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Nelson v. State, 670 So.2d 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Remanded with directions.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.