Opinion

Bowens v. Board of Law Examiners of State of N.C.

  • 804 F.2d 1250
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33504
  • 1986 WL 16155
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Nov 12, 1986
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 16.2%

The opinion

804 F.2d 1250

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Larry Dean BOWENS, D. Lester Diggs, Clifton Edward Graves,

Jr., Earl Frederick Jones, G. Angaza

Laughinghouse, Emery L. Rann, III, and

Marion Weaver, Appellants,

v.

The Board of Law Examiners of the State of North Carolina:

Horace E. Stacy, Jr., Individually and in his representative

capacity as Chairman of the Board of Law Examiners of the

State of N.C., W.H. McElwee, Walter R. McGuire, Francis I.

Parker, Eric C. Michaux, James Mullen, C. Edwin Allman, John

T. Allred, John D. Warlick, Jr., James L. Nelson and Arch

Schoch, Jr., Individually and in their representative

capacities as members of the Board of Law Examiners of the

State of N.C., and Fred P. Parker, III, Individually and in

his official capacity as Executive Secretary to the Board of

Law Examiners of the State of N.C., Appellees.

No. 86-1511.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 30, 1986.

Decided Nov. 12, 1986.

Larry Dean Bowens, D. Lester Diggs, Clifton Edward Graves, Jr., Earl Frederick Jones, G. Angaza Laughinghouse, Emery L. Rann, III, Marion Weaver, appellants pro se.

E. Osborne Ayscue, Jr., Helms, Mulliss, Johnston, for appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. F.T. Dupree, Jr., District Judge. (C/A No. 82-1224-CIV-5)

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from the court's order denying relief is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Bowens v. Board of Law Examiners, C/A No. 82-1224-CIV-5 (E.D.N.C., Jan. 6, 1986).

2

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.