Opinion

Charles Alvin Brown v. Nathan Rice and Rufus L. Edminsten, Attorney General of North Carolina

  • 803 F.2d 713
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32100
  • 1986 WL 17875
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Oct 10, 1986
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

803 F.2d 713

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles Alvin BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Nathan RICE and Rufus L. Edminsten, Attorney General of

North Carolina, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-7647.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 16, 1986.

Decided Oct. 10, 1986.

Charles Alvin Brown, appellant pro se.

Barry Steven McNeill, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellees.

W.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL, HALL and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Rice, C/A No. 84-26-M (W.D.N.C., Mar. 17, 1986).

2

DISMISSED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.