Opinion

Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

  • 136 So. 2d 286
  • 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1605
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed
Dec 11, 1961
Status
Published
Author
Tate
On the bench
Hood, Savoy, Tate
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 71.0%

The opinion

TATE, Judge.

This is a companion suit to Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, 136 So.2d 283 , arising out of the same accident and involving the same issue on appeal. For the reasons more fully assigned in the companion suit, we affirm the judgment of the district court dismissing the third party demand filed by the defendant-appellants impleading the Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company as third party defendant. Costs to be paid by the defendants-appellants.

Affirmed.

On Application for Rehearing

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.