Opinion

Pirtle v. City of Titusville

  • 101 So. 2d 397
  • 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2692
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Mar 21, 1958
Status
Published
On the bench
Allen, Kanner, Shannon
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 83.2%

The opinion

■ PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final decree in an action brought by Eugene B. Pirtle against the City of Titusville and North Brevard County Hospital District Board in which plaintiff sought a- declaratory decree as to a certain deed of dedication and sought to have another deed cancelled. The decree dismissed the suit and granted defendants damage on an injunction bond which had been filed by the plaintiff. The Circuit Judge dismissed the complaint and in his order found that there was no showing in the -complaint nor in the proof that there would be any injury resulting to the plaintiff different in kind from that sustained by the public generally, nor that the action sought to be enjoined would result in any increase in taxes or any special injury to the plaintiff.

We are of the opinion that upon the rec- ' ord presented there was no showing of interest in the plaintiff different from the public generally. Therefore, we affirm the lower court upon the authority of the following cases: Rickman v. Whitehurst, 73 Fla. 152 , 74 So. 205 ; Metropolis Pub. Co. v. City of Miami, 100 Fla. 784 , 129 So. 913 ; Lykes Bros., Inc., v. Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage District, Fla., 41 So.2d 898 ; Bryan v. City of Miami, Fla., 56 So.2d 924, 926 ; Town of Flagler Beach v. Green, Fla., 83 So.2d 598 .

Affirmed.

KANNER, C. J., ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.