Opinion

Sunbelt Securities Inc., the Fisher Group, Cheryl Brown and Jeanine Fisher v. David Mark Mandell

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
May 18, 2021
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.5%

noting that Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 29.3 provides appellate court authority to issue stay orders

How later courts described this case

  • noting that Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 29.3 provides appellate court authority to issue stay orders

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Sunbelt Securities, Inc., Jeanine Fisher, Cheryl Brown &

The Fisher Group v. David Mandell & Raymond J. Black,

Administrator of the Estate of William Mandell, Deceased

Appellate case number: 01-21-00209-CV

Trial court case number: 473747-402

Trial court: Probate Court No. 1 of Harris County

On April 28, 2021, appellants, Sunbelt Securities, Inc., Jeanine Fisher, Cheryl

Brown, and The Fisher Group (the “Sunbelt appellants”), filed a notice of appeal from the

trial court’s April 9, 2021 order denying appellants’ motion to compel arbitration. On May

3, 2021, the Sunbelt appellants collectively filed an “Emergency Motion for Stay Pending

Appeal of Order Denying Arbitration,” requesting that this Court stay the trial court

proceedings “including all pre-trial proceedings and discovery, pending appeal to the

extent the trial proceedings touch or are related to [a]ppellee David Mandell’s and

[a]ppellee Administrator Raymond J. Black’s claims against” the Sunbelt appellants.

On May 10, 2021, appellee, David Mandell, filed a response in opposition to the

Sunbelt appellants’ emergency motion for stay. Also on May 10, 2021, appellee, Raymond

J. Black, Jr., permanent administrator of the Estate of William Mandell, filed a response in

opposition to the Sunbelt appellants’ emergency motion for stay.

The Sunbelt appellants’ emergency motion for stay is granted. See TEX. R. APP. P.

29.3 (appellate court may make temporary orders necessary to preserve parties’ rights

pending disposition of interlocutory appeal); In re Geomet Recycling LLC, 578 S.W.3d 82,

87 (Tex. 2019) (noting that Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 29.3 provides appellate

court authority to issue stay orders); PlainsCapital Bank v. Krasovec, No. 03-19-00808-

CV, 2020 WL 1071363, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Mar. 5, 2020, order), disp. on merits,

No. 03-19-00808-CV, 2020 WL 3163774, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin June 5, 2020, no pet.)

(granting emergency motion to stay underlying proceedings pending appeal of order

denying motion to compel arbitration).

The proceedings in the trial court case number 473747-402, related to claims

asserted against the Sunbelt appellants, are stayed, including counts IV, V, VI, VII, VIII,

IX, X, XI, XII, XIII, and XIV in appellee’s Third Amended Petition and Application for

Temporary Restraining Order and Temporary and Permanent Injunctions. This stay is only

in connection with the above-specified claims to the extent they “touch or are related to”

the Sunbelt appellants. This order does not stay or otherwise impact the trial court

proceedings, including any claims or causes of action against any other party. This stay

shall be in effect until the disposition of this appeal or until further order of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Amparo Guerra______

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___May 18, 2021____

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.