Opinion

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court
United States Court of Federal Claims
Filed
Mar 19, 2021
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Brian H. Corcoran
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-1705V

UNPUBLISHED

JOSHUA BROWN, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: February 16, 2021

v.

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Respondent. Administration (SIRVA)

Alison H. Haskins, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.

Mollie Danielle Gorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On November 4, 2019, Joshua Brown filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he received an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on

September 27, 2018 and subsequently suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1, 4-5. The case was assigned to the Special

Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On February 16, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, Respondent has concluded that compensation is appropriate in this case.

1

Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

(2012).

Id. at 1. Respondent further agrees that Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for

compensation under the Vaccine Act. Id. at 4.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.