Opinion

Claybrooks, Sondra L. v. Insight Global, LLC

  • 2021 TN WC 152
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Mar 3, 2021
Status
Published
On the bench
Robert Durham
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT NASHVILLE

SONDRA L. CLAYBROOKS, ) Docket No 2020-06-0489

Employee, )

Vv. )

INSIGHT GLOBAL, LLC, ) State File No. 23248-2020

Employer, )

And )

TWIN CITY FIRE INS. CO., ) Judge Robert Durham

Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

This case came before the Court on February 26, 2021, for an Expedited Hearing.

Ms. Claybrooks sought medical and temporary disability benefits for various injuries she

allegedly sustained from a slip and fall at work. The Court holds that Ms. Claybrooks did

not establish she is likely to prove entitlement to reimbursement for past expenses or

temporary disability benefits. However, Insight is required to provide a panel of

orthopedists to treat any injuries caused by her fall.

History of Claim

Ms. Claybrooks’s undisputed testimony was that on May 9, 2019, she went to the

restroom while at a work meeting. She slipped on the wet restroom floor, causing her

legs to “split” before she fell on her right side. She immediately reported the fall to her

manager, Kwaneka Fields, completed an accident report, and sought care at Vanderbilt

Health Clinic (VHC).' Insight did not provide a panel.

Ms. Claybrooks treated with Deborah Baker, P.A. at VHC. She complained of

pain in her right hip and buttock, and her x-rays revealed mild osteoarthritis. P.A. Baker

diagnosed a right hip/hamstring/low back strain and recommended over-the-counter pain

medications after Ms. Claybrooks declined an NSAID injection. PA Baker

"It is unclear from the record whether Insight authorized Ms. Claybrooks’ visit to VHC.

1

recommended that she follow up with an orthopedist if her symptoms persisted. Ms.

Claybrooks testified that P.A. Baker took her off work for five days, but the note does not

address work status. She did not submit any more records from VHC.

Ms. Claybrooks stated that she returned to work on May 14 after Ms. Fields said

company policy required her to do so. That same day, Abbi Livingston, with Insight’s

human resources, told her she was turning the claim over to the workers’ compensation

carrier. Again, Insight did not provide a panel.

Ms. Claybrooks further testified that she returned to VHC several times until Ms.

Fields told her that she could not take any more time off work. She stated that Insight

terminated her on July 19 without explanation.

Ms. Claybrooks submitted emails with Ms. Livingston asking about lost wages,

which stated that the claim had been submitted to Insight’s carrier. However, Ms.

Claybrooks stated that the emails were not her only conversations regarding benefits, and

she had also requested reimbursement for medical expenses and additional care.

In February and March 2020, Ms. Claybrooks underwent x-rays and an EMG/NCS

at Vanderbilt Orthopedics due to right-hand numbness and tingling. The EMG/NCS

report showed evidence of mild right-carpal tunnel syndrome; however, nothing

suggested it was work-related. Ms. Claybrooks did not submit any other records

regarding her hand, hip, knee or low back, although she introduced several pages of

medical bills from various providers.”

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Ms. Claybrooks must present evidence from which this Court can determine that

she is likely to prove at trial that she is entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. See

generally McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

LEXIS 6, at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015). The Court has no reason to doubt that she fell at work as

she described. However, she must show that her fall caused injuries that required further

treatment and left her temporarily disabled. The Court finds she has not done so at this

time.

To prove causation, Ms. Claybrooks must show to a reasonable degree of medical

certainty that her work injury contributed more than fifty percent in causing her

complaints, considering all causes. “Reasonable degree of medical certainty” means “it

is more likely than not considering all causes, as opposed to speculation or uncertainty.”

° The day before the hearing, Ms. Claybrooks filed another Petition for Benefit Determination alleging she

suffered an ear injury due to use of her headphones at Insight. The Court informed her that the petition

would be processed as a separate injury and would not be considered at this hearing.

2

See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14) (2020). Given that the standard requires “medical

certainty,” causation generally must be shown through an expert medical opinion. /d.

Ms. Claybrooks did not submit any medical opinion that addressed the cause of

her symptoms, the reason for any past treatment, or whether her symptoms restricted her

employment. Given the record before it, the Court cannot find that she is likely to prove

causation and thus denies her requests for reimbursement of medical expenses and

temporary disability benefits.

Even though Ms. Claybrooks did not show a likelihood of prevailing on causation,

the Court must still consider her entitlement to a panel of physicians under Tennessee

Code Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(4)(A). It is undisputed that Insight never offered

her a panel upon receiving notice of her accident. The Appeals Board has held that a lack

of medical evidence regarding causation does not necessarily eliminate the employer’s

obligation to provide a physician panel. See Lewis v. Molly Maid, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp.

App. Bd. LEXIS 19, at *8-9 (Apr. 20, 2016).

Here, it bears repeating that neither Insight nor its carrier presented Ms.

Claybrooks with a panel of physicians after receiving notice of her work-related accident.

Insight did not provide any justification for this failure, other than contending that Ms.

Claybrooks did not establish she required additional care. The Court holds this is an

insufficient reason and orders Insight to provide Ms. Brooks with a panel of orthopedists

from which she may choose a doctor to treat any injuries caused by her fall at work. In

addition, the Court refers the issue to the Bureau’s Compliance Program to investigate

and determine if, and to what extent, it should issue a penalty.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:

1. Ms. Claybrooks’s request for reimbursement for past medical expenses and

temporary disability benefits is denied at this time.

2. Insight shall provide Ms. Claybrooks with a panel of orthopedists from which she

can select a doctor to treat any injuries caused by her fall at work.

3. This case is referred to the Bureau’s Compliance Program to determine if, and to

what extent, a penalty is warranted.

4. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance

with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry

of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3).

The Insurer or Self-Insured Employer must submit confirmation of compliance

with this Order to the Bureau by email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no

later than the seventh business day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the

3

necessary confirmation within the period of compliance might result in a penalty

assessment for non-compliance. For questions regarding compliance, please

contact the Workers’ Compensation Compliance Unit via email at

WCCompliance.Program@tn. gov.

5. This case is set for a Scheduling Hearing on April 16, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. Central

Time. The parties must call 615-253-0010 or 855-689-9049 toll-free to participate

in the Scheduling Hearing. Failure to appear might result in a determination of the

issues without the party’s participation.

ENTERED on March 3, 2020.

ROBERT DURHAM, JUDGE

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

APPENDIX

Technical Record:

1. Petition for Benefit Determination

Dispute Certification Notice

Request for Expedited Hearing

Order Granting Employer’s Motion for Witness by Telephone

Order Granting Continuance

Employer’s Response to Request for Expedited Hearing

Order Granting Continuance

NAYUAR WN

Exhibits:

1. EMG/NCS Study

2. Various Medical Bills

3. Advanced Imaging Bill

4. Medical Note Excusing Absence dated July 11, 2019

5. X-Rays of Right Hand

6. Right Hip X-Ray Report

7. C-32 Form Regarding Right Ear

8. Additional Medical Bills

9. Emails between Ms. Claybrooks and Ms. Livingston

10. Petition for Benefit Determination filed on February 25, 2021 (for

identification only)

11. Medical Records from VHC

12. Operative Report dated February 5, 2021 (for identification only)

4

13. Emails between Ms. Claybrooks and Ms. Livingston

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on March 3, 2021.

Name Certified Via Via __| Service sent to:

Mail Fax Email

Sondra Claybrooks x Slclay2228@gmail.com

L. Blair Cannon x Blair.cannon@thehartford.com

Compliance Program x WCComplaince.Program@tn.gov

a 11 uy ML Aa

Penny Shrifmi, Clerk of Court

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the

Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the

date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must

serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of

the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file

it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both

parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’

Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof

conceming factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be

a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten

business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The

party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business

days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a

statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the

expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of

the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an

argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wce.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.:

State File No.:

Date of injury:

Employee

Employer

Notice is given that

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-

stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):

0 Expedited Hearing Order filed on O Motion Order filed on

0 Compensation Order filed on C1 Other Order filed on

issued by Judge

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): fo Employer] ‘Employee

Address: Phone:

Email:

Attorney’s Name: BPR#:

Attorney's Email: Phone:

Attorney's Address:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page lof 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: Docket No.: Date of Inj.:

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): [| Employer [- ‘Employee

Appellee’s Address: Phone:

Email:

Attorney’s Name: BPR#:

Attorney’s Email: Phone:

Attorney’s Address:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, , certify that | have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the day of , 20

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.