Opinion

Millsaps, Lisa v. Luis Arellano d/b/a Los Alamos Restaurant

  • 2021 TN WC 142
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Feb 4, 2021
Status
Published
On the bench
Dale Tipps
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 14.9%

The opinion

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MURFREESBORO

LISA MILLSAPS, ) Docket No. 2020-05-0636

Employee, )

v. )

)

LUIS ARELLANO d/b/a/ ) State File No. 39889-2020

LOS ALAMOS RESTAURANT )

Uninsured Employer. ) Judge Dale Tipps

)

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING BENEFITS

This case came before the Court on January 26, 2021, for an Expedited Hearing on

whether Ms. Millsaps is entitled to medical and temporary disability benefits.!_ Ms.

Millsaps claimed she suffered a broken hip while working for Mr. Arellano, the owner of

Los Alamos Restaurant. For the reasons below, the Court holds that Ms. Millsaps is likely

to prevail at a hearing on the merits that she is entitled to medical treatment and temporary

disability benefits. However, she has not shown at this time that she is entitled to payment

of her medical bills.

History of Claim

Ms. Millsaps testified she began working at Los Alamos as a server on May 23,

2020. Near the end of her first shift, she slipped and fell on her way to make a customer’s

drink. Ms. Millsaps could not get up, so co-workers called an ambulance. The EMTs took

her to Southern Tennessee Medical Center, where she was diagnosed with a hip and femur

fracture. The Medical Center transferred Ms. Millsaps to Erlanger Hospital, where the

fracture was surgically repaired.

After surgery, Ms. Millsaps stayed in the trauma center for nine days. She has

required a walker since then and has been unable to work. Ms. Millsaps cannot afford the

additional treatment and therapy recommended by her doctor because her claim was denied

' The hearing was scheduled to be conducted by videoconference, but Mr. Arellano was unable to sign in.

Instead, by agreement of the parties, he appeared by phone.

1

and she has no insurance. She therefore filed a Petition for Benefit Determination on June

29, 2020, noting that Mr. Arellano was uninsured.

Mr. Arellano admitted Ms. Millsaps was his employee and that she was to receive

minimum wage during her training period.” He also acknowledged he had no workers’

compensation insurance at the time of the accident. However, Mr. Arellano contended the

accident was not compensable for several reasons. First, Ms. Millsaps should not have

been behind the bar to get a customer’s drink because she was still training. Next, she

should have been wearing non-slip shoes. In addition, he believed Ms. Millsaps had

smoked marijuana during her break, and she refused a requested drug screen at the hospital.

Mr. Arellano noted that Ms. Millsaps had a serious car accident in 2016 and walked

with a limp. He believed that her hip was damaged or weakened by that accident, and he

argued he should not be responsible for any aggravation or new injury to these pre-existing

conditions. Further, Mr. Arellano also questioned whether the injury occurred as Ms.

Millsaps described because she was lying in a different area when he was called to the

restaurant after the accident, and none of the customers or coworkers actually heard or saw

her fall. He suggested she staged this accident to obtain additional medical treatment for

her previous injuries.

The only medical records Ms. Millsaps introduced into evidence were a single

treatment record from Southern Tennessee Medical Center and five medical bills.7 The

Medical Center record showed the emergency department treated her on March 23 for a

hip injury caused by a workplace fall. It also stated Ms. Millsaps was unable to walk after

the injury.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

For the Court to grant Ms. Millsaps’s request, she must prove she is likely to prevail

at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2019); McCord v.

Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar.

27, 2015). To prove a compensable injury, Ms. Millsaps must show that her alleged

injuries arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of her employment. This

normally includes the requirement that she must show, “to a reasonable degree of medical

certainty that [the incident] contributed more than fifty percent (50%) in causing the. . .

disablement or need for medical treatment, considering all causes.” See Tenn. Code Ann.

* Current federal minimum wage is $7.25. At forty hours per week, this yields an average weekly wage of

$290.00 and a compensation rate of $193.33.

3Mr. Arellano claimed to have additional records that he wanted to offer as proof, but he did not file them

with the Court before the hearing. The Court denied his request for a continuance to file those records

because he did not make it in advance of the hearing and he did not participate in the pre-hearing conference

on January 6. Mr. Arellano also objected to the medical record and bills. The Court overruled the objection,

as he was unable to articulate a legal ground for excluding them.

2

§ 50-6-102(14). However, medical evidence is not required to establish a causal

relationship, “in the most obvious, simple and routine cases.” Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring

Co., 274 S.W.3d 638, 643 (Tenn. 2008) (quoting Orman vy. Williams Sonoma, Inc., 803

S.W.2d 672, 676 (Tenn. 1991)).

First, the Court finds that Ms. Millsaps proved she slipped and fell on May 23.

Therefore, the Court holds she is likely to show a specific incident, identifiable by time and

place, at trial. Although Ms. Millsaps did not provide a medical opinion as to the cause of

her injury, her case is sufficiently “obvious, simple and routine” for the Court to find she

is likely to prevail on the merits. It is undisputed that Ms. Millsaps was transported to the

hospital, where she received extensive medical treatment for a broken hip. This is

consistent with her testimony that she injured her hip when she fell and was unable to stand

or walk. Thus, she appears likely to prove a compensable injury.

Mr. Arellano’s defenses are unpersuasive. Even if he were to show that Ms.

Millsaps should not have been behind the bar or that she was wearing improper shoes, the

affirmative defense of willful misconduct requires him to prove: (1) the employee’s actual,

as opposed to constructive, notice of the rule; (2) the employee’s understanding of the

danger involved in violating the rule; (3) the employer’s bona fide enforcement of the rule;

and, (4) the employee’s lack of a valid excuse for violating the rule. Mitchell v. Fayetteville

Pub. Utilities, 368 S.W.3d 442, 453 (Tenn. 2012). Mr. Arellano did not present this proof.

Similarly, Mr. Arellano failed to present any proof that Ms. Millsaps had used

marijuana, that she was intoxicated or impaired, or that her accident was the result of any

impairment. See Woodard v. Freeman Expositions, LLC, 2020 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

LEXIS 15, at *4-5 (Apr. 3, 2020) (an employer must present evidence that an employee's

alleged illegal drug use was the proximate cause of her injuries).

Finally, Mr. Arellano’s argument that Ms. Millsaps’s current condition is somehow

related to her 2016 accident is unsupported by any medical proof, and neither Mr. Arellano

nor the Court are qualified to make that medical determination. Further, his assertion that

Ms. Millsaps staged this incident or is using it to obtain additional treatment for a

preexisting condition is belied by the facts of the case. Ms. Millsaps suffered a broken hip,

a serious and debilitating condition. The suggestion that she worked a full shift as a server

with a broken hip (that required surgical repair) before staging this accident borders on the

absurd.

Medical Benefits

Having found Ms. Millsaps is likely to prevail in proving a work-related injury, the

Court turns to her request for medical benefits. Under the Workers’ Compensation Law,

“the employer or the employer’s agent shall furnish, free of charge to the employee, such

medical and surgical treatment... made reasonably necessary by accident[.]” Tenn. Code

3

Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(1)(A). Further, Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-

204(a)(3)(A)G) requires that, “when the employee has suffered an injury and expressed a

need for medical care,” the employer must provide a medical panel from which the

employee may select the treating physician. Here, Mr. Arellano did not do so, and Ms.

Millsaps was forced to seek treatment on her own. The Court holds Ms. Millsaps provided

sufficient evidence to show that she is entitled to a panel of physicians. Mr. Arellano shall

provide a panel from which Ms. Millsaps may choose an authorized physician for

treatment.

Ms. Millsaps requested payment of the medical bills admitted into evidence.

Because of this, she has the burden of demonstrating that any treatment not authorized by

the employer is reasonable and medically necessary.”. McClendon v. Food Lion, LLC, No.

E2013-00380-WC-R3-WC, 2014 Tenn. LEXIS 518, at *8 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel

July 11, 2014). The Court cannot order payment of those bills at this time because it has

no expert proof of the reasonableness and necessity of her treatment. This does not prevent

Ms. Millsaps from presenting the requisite proof at a later hearing.

Temporary Disability Benefits

Ms. Millsaps also requested temporary disability benefits. To receive temporary

total disability (TTD) benefits, she must prove (1) she became disabled from working due

to a compensable injury; (2) a causal connection between her injury and her inability to

work; and (3) her period of disability. or temporary partial disability benefits, Ms.

Millsaps must show that her treating physician returned her to work with restrictions that

Mr. Arellano either could not or would not accommodate. See Jones v. Crencor Leasing

and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7, 8 (Dec. 11, 2015).

Ms. Millsaps testified that she was in a rehabilitation facility for nine days after her

surgery. The Court accepts this as proof that she was unable to work during that time

because of her work injury. Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-205(a) provides that

no compensation shall be allowed for the first seven days of disability. Consequently, the

only TTD benefits the Court can order at this time are for the last two days of this period.

It appears very likely that Ms. Millsaps had a lengthy period of temporary disability,

but she presented no medical proof as to how long her physicians took her completely off

work or assigned restrictions because of her injury. The Court cannot guess or estimate

the time she was disabled or restricted from working but must have medical proof before

it can order additional temporary disability benefits.

Finally, concerning payment of benefits, Mr. Arellano must provide medical and

temporary disability benefits. However, since he did not have workers’ compensation

insurance at the time of the injury, the Uninsured Employers Fund has discretion to pay

limited medical expenses if certain criteria are met. (See attached Benefits Request Form.)

4

Ms. Millsaps must show that she: 1) worked for an uninsured employer; 2) suffered an

injury arising primarily in the course and scope of employment on or after July 1, 2015; 3)

was a Tennessee resident on the date of injury; 4) provided notice to the Bureau of the

injury and of the employer’s lack of coverage within sixty days of the injury; and, 5)

secured a judgment for workers’ compensation benefits against Mr. Arellano for the injury.

Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-801(d)(1)-(5).

The Court finds that Ms. Millsaps worked for an uninsured employer, Luis Arellano,

and that she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits that she suffered an injury arising

primarily from employment on May 23, 2020. She was a Tennessee resident on that date,

and she provided notice to the Bureau of her injury and Mr. Arellano’s lack of insurance

within sixty days. This order serves as a judgment for benefits. Therefore, Ms. Millsaps

satisfied all the requirements of section 50-6-801(d).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Mr. Arellano shall provide Ms. Millsaps with a panel of physicians and medical

treatment made reasonably necessary by her May 23, 2020 injury under Tennessee

Code Annotated section 50-6-204.

2. Mr. Arellano shall pay Ms. Millsaps temporary total disability benefits in the

amount of $55.24 for two of the days she spent in the rehabilitation facility.

3. Ms. Millsaps satisfied the requirements of Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-

6-801(d) and thus is eligible to request limited medical benefits from the Uninsured

Employers Fund at the Administrator’s discretion. To do so, she must complete and

file the attached form.

4. This case is set for a Status Hearing on April 14, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. Please call toll-

free at 855-874-0473 to participate. Failure to call might result in a determination

of the issues without your further participation. All conferences are set using

Central Time.

5. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance

with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry

of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3). The

Insurer or Self-Insured Employer must submit confirmation of compliance with this

Order to the Bureau by email to WCCompliance.Program @tn.gov no later than the

seventh business day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary

confirmation within the period of compliance might result in a penalty assessment

for non-compliance. For questions regarding compliance, please contact the

Workers’ Compensation Compliance Unit via email at

WCCompliance.Program @tn. gov.

ENTERED February 4, 2021.

CZLE” 2

Judge Dale Tipps

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Affidavit of Lisa Millsaps

2. Notarized Investigative Report

3. Medical Record and Bills

Technical record:

1. Petition for Benefit Determination

2. Dispute Certification Notice

3. Request for Expedited Hearing

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was sent as indicated on

February 4, 2021.

Name Certified Fax |Email | Service sent to:

Mail

Lisa Millsaps xX Lisamillsaps83 @ gmail.com

Luis Arellano xX louivalentino @ gmail.com

Amanda Terry xX Amanda.Terry @tn.gov

LaShawn Pender xX lashawn.pender @tn. gov

fj /

ya Gon yaa dh

Penny Shriim, Clerk of Court

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

WC.CourtClerk @ th.gov

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the

Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the

date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must

serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of

the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file

it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both

parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’

Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof

conceming factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be

a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten

business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The

party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business

days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a

statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the

expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of

the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an

argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wce.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.:

State File No.:

Date of injury:

Employee

Employer

Notice is given that

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-

stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):

0 Expedited Hearing Order filed on O Motion Order filed on

0 Compensation Order filed on C1 Other Order filed on

issued by Judge

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): fo Employer] ‘Employee

Address: Phone:

Email:

Attorney’s Name: BPR#:

Attorney's Email: Phone:

Attorney's Address:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page lof 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: Docket No.: Date of Inj.:

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): [| Employer [- ‘Employee

Appellee’s Address: Phone:

Email:

Attorney’s Name: BPR#:

Attorney’s Email: Phone:

Attorney’s Address:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, , certify that | have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the day of , 20

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.