Opinion

Pascal, S. v. City of Pgh ZBA

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Oct 13, 2020
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

STEPHEN PASCAL AND CHRIS GATES, : No. 142 WAL 2020

:

Petitioners :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal

: from the Order of the

v. : Commonwealth Court

:

:

CITY OF PITTSBURGH ZONING BOARD :

OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY OF :

PITTSBURGH AND NORTHSIDE :

LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. The parties are directed to state their

positions -- and to stipulate if possible -- regarding whether LaShawn Burton-Faulk served

on the Northside Leadership Conference Board of Directors during the Zoning Board of

Adjustment proceedings. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as

stated by Petitioners, are:

(1) Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the trial court’s

order upholding the grant Owner of the zoning relief requested despite the

conflict of interest of ZBA member Burton-Faulk?

(2) Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the trial court’s

order upholding the grant to Owner of the zoning relief requested where the

ZBA failed to issue a written decision within forty-five (45) days of the public

hearing and where applicant did not agree in writing or on the record to an

extension of time within forty-five (45) days of the public hearing?

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.