Opinion

Miranda, David v. Don Ledford Automative

  • 2020 TN WC 23
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Feb 11, 2020
Status
Published
On the bench
Audrey A. Headrick
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Feb 11, 2020

02:59 PM(ET)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT CHATTANOOGA

David Miranda, ) Docket No. 2019-01-0603

Employee, )

v. ) State File No. 75425-2018

Don Ledford Automotive, )

Self-Insured Employer. ) Judge Audrey A. Headrick

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

(DECISION ON THE RECORD)

This case came before the Court on Mr. Miranda’s Request for an Expedited

Hearing on the record. The issue involves referrals and panel designations.

Mr. Miranda argued Don Ledford provided an invalid panel of orthopedists

because his authorized physician referred him for a neurosurgeon examination. Don

Ledford argued that because Mr. Miranda selected an orthopedist from the panel and

received treatment, he cannot now change that selection. As a remedy, Mr. Miranda

requested that the Court designate his second-opinion physician and his independent

medical evaluation physician as authorized treating physicians. For the reasons below,

the Court denies Mr. Miranda’s request.

History of Claim

Mr. Miranda tripped and fell at work on September 14, 2018, landing on his knees.

He received authorized treatment for his knees initially at a walk-in clinic and later from

Dr. Todd Grebner, an orthopedist.' When he complained of back pain for the first time

on October 9, Dr. Grebner referred Mr. Miranda to a neurosurgeon but did not specify a

particular neurosurgeon.

Despite the neurosurgeon referral, Don Ledford provided Mr. Miranda with a

' It is unknown whether Mr. Miranda selected Dr. Grebner from a panel.

panel of orthopedists, and he selected Dr. Rickey Hutcheson from the panel. Dr.

Hutcheson diagnosed a work-related back sprain, provided conservative treatment, and

ordered a Functional Capacity Evaluation, which showed reliable effort.2 Due to his

progressive symptoms, Dr. Hutcheson referred Mr. Miranda to Dr. Joseph Miller, a

neurosurgeon, for a second opinion.

Mr. Miranda saw Dr. Miller in March 2019. Dr. Miller referred him to an

orthopedist for a hip evaluation. He also ordered a bilateral lower-extremity EMG nerve

conduction study and a series of epidural steroid injections. Later, Dr. Miller provided an

opinion that the fall primarily caused Mr. Miranda’s injury, aggravating a pre-existing

degenerative back condition.

After seeing Dr. Miller, Mr. Miranda returned to Dr. Hutcheson. After reviewing

Dr. Miller’s recommendations, he x-rayed Mr. Miranda’s hips and found no arthritis or

necrosis. Dr. Hutcheson ordered the recommended NCS of the lower extremities,

epidural injections, and physical therapy, and he prescribed Cymbalta. Don Ledford

denied the epidural injections and physical therapy.

In June 2019, Dr. Hutcheson determined “[t]he radicular component and the

degeneration is a preexisting [back] condition, so greater than 51% causation of his

radicular symptoms is associated with his preexisting degenerative condition.” Dr.

Hutcheson assigned an impairment rating for Mr. Miranda’s work-related back sprain and

instructed him to follow-up as needed.

Afterward, Mr. Miranda underwent an independent medical evaluation with Dr.

Stephen Dreskin, a pain-management physician. Dr. Dreskin concluded that Mr.

Miranda’s fall primarily caused a disc herniation and radiculopathy causing chronic pain

in his low back and right thigh.’ Further, Dr. Dreskin recommended lumbar spine

surgery and assigned an impairment rating.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Standard Applied

Mr. Miranda must present sufficient evidence from which the Court can determine

he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1)

(2019). The Court holds he did not satisfy this burden.

’ Before and after Mr. Miranda’s FCE, Dr. Hutcheson made references to symptom magnification.

> Dr. Dreskin referenced an exaggerated response during examination but noted he believed that Mr.

Miranda’s pain was genuine.

Analysis

Medical Benefits

The Workers’ Compensation Law requires an employer to provide an injured

employee with medical and surgical treatment ordered by the treating physician and made

reasonably necessary by the accident. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)(i). To that

end, the employer must provide a list of three or more independent reputable physicians,

surgeons, chiropractors or specialty practice groups from which the injured employee

shall select one to be the treating physician. Jd. When the panel-selected physician

makes a referral to a specialist, the employer shall be deemed to have accepted the

referral unless the employer provides a panel of three or more independent reputable

physicians within three business days. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)(ii). In

cases where the employer provides a panel, the employee may choose a specialist to

provide treatment only from the panel provided by the employer. Jd.; see also Rhodes v.

Amazon.com, LLC, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *12-15 (June 11, 2019).

Here, the Court has no evidence that Dr. Grebner was selected from a panel, but he

was an authorized physician. Dr. Grebner made a referral to a neurosurgeon but

designated no particular physician. In response, Don Ledford provided a panel of

orthopedic specialists.

The parties submitted no evidence that Dr. Grebner, the referring physician, was

panel-selected. Under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)(ii), Don

Ledford was not required to provide Mr. Miranda with a panel of neurosurgeons unless

Dr. Grebner was panel-selected. Therefore, the Court denies Mr. Miranda’s request to

designate his second opinion physician and his independent medical evaluation physician

as authorized treating physicians.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. The Court denies Mr. Miranda’s request.

2. This case is set for a Status Hearing on Tuesday, April 21, 2020, at 1:00 p.m.

Eastern Time. The parties must call (423) 634-0164 or toll-free at (855) 383-

0001 to participate. Failure to call may result in a determination of the issues

without the party’s participation.

ENTERED February 11, 2020.

Oe Mow ee awed

AUDREY A\HEADRICK

Workers’ Compensation Judge

Exhibits:

1.

2.

3.

CORP NAMN SF

APPENDIX

Affidavit of Dr. Miller

a. Physician’s Statement-Dr. Miller

Dr. Miller’s office visit, March 19, 2019

Affidavit of Dr. Dreskin

a. Physician’s Statement-Dr. Miller

b. Independent Medical Evaluation

Recorded Interview of Mr. Miranda, Page 4 of 9, taken September 27, 2018

Medical records of Physicians Care

Panel (Dr. Hutcheson)

Medical records of Dr. Grebner

Declaration of Dr. Hutcheson

Medical records of Dr. Hutcheson

Technical record:

1,

io

Petition for Benefit Determination

Dispute Certification Notice

Request for Expedited Hearing

Objection to the Request for an Expedited Hearing on the Record

Plaintiff's Additional Response to the Objection Filed on Behalf of the

Defendant to a Decision by the Court on the Record for Expedited Hearing

Docketing Notice

. Employer’s Response to Plaintiff's Reply to the Employer’s Objection to the

Request for an Expedited Hearing on the Record

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on February 11, 2020.

Employer’s Attorney

Name Certified | Email | Service sent to:

Mail

Michael A. Wagner, x maw(@wagnerinjury.com

Employee’s Attorney

Debra L. Fulton, x dfulton@fmsllp.com

Pv Susan N \entiaodin\?

PENNY SHRWM, COURT CLERK “

we.courtclerk@tn.gov

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the

Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the

date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must

serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. Ifa transcript of

the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file

it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both

parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’

Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof

concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be

a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten

business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The

party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business

days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a

statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the

expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of

the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an

argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tr gov/workforce /injiries-at-work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.:

State File No.:

Date of Injury:

Employee

Vv.

Employer

Notice is given that

[List name(s) of all appealing partyfies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-

stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):

0 Expedited Hearing Order filed on CO Motion Order filed on

1 Compensation Order filed on QO Other Order filed on

issued by Judge

Statement of the Issues on Apneal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party}: CO Employerl_jEmployee

Address: Phone:

Email:

Attorney's Name: BPR#:

Attorney's Email: Phone:

Attorney’s Address:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appeltant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: Docket No.» Date of Inj.:

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party}:. (J Employer (JEmployee

Appellee’s Address: Phone:

Email:

Attorney’s Name: .BPR#:

Attorney’s Email: Phone:.

Attorney's Address:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, , certify that | have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the day of , 20 .

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant}

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

Tennessee Bureau of Workers' Compensation

220 French Landing Drive, 1-B

Nashville, TN 37243-1002

800-332-2687

AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY

}, , having been duly swom according to law, make oath that

because of my poverty, | am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to. appeal be

waived. The following facts support my poverty.

1. Full Name: 2. Address:

3. Telephone Number: 4, Date of Birth:

5. Names and Ages of All Dependents:

Relationship;

Relatlonship:

Relationship:

Relationship:

6. | am employed by.

My employer's address Ia:

My employer's phone number ts:

7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:

$

8. | receive of expect to receive money from tha following sources:

AFDC $ per month beginning

Ss] $ per month beginning.

Ratirement $ per month beginning

Disability § per month beginning

Unemployment $ per month beginning

Worker's Comp.$ per month beginning

Other $ per month beginning

LB-1108 (REV 11/)5) RDA 11082

9. My expenses are:

Rent/House Payment $ parmonth MedicalDental §

Groceries $ per month Telephone $

Electricity $ “_ per month School Supplies $

Water $ per month Clothing $

Gas $ per month Child Care $

Transportation $__ sper month Child Support $

Car $ per month

Other § per month (describe:

10. Assets:

Automabile $ (FMV)

Checking/Savings Acct. §

House 3 . (FMV)

Other $ Describe:

11. My debts are:

Amount Owed To Whom

per month

per manth

per month

per month

per month

par month

{ hereby declare under the penalty of porjury that the faregolng answors are true,

and that | am financially unable to pay the costs of this appaal.

APPELLANT

Sworn and aubscribed before me, a notary public, this

day of 20

NOTARY PUBLIC

My Commission Expires:

LB-1108 (REV 1/15)

correct, and complete

RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.