Opinion

Isom, Brenden v. Cherokee Truck Equipment, LLC

  • 2019 TN WC 162
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Nov 20, 2019
Status
Published
On the bench
Audrey A. Headrick
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Nov 20, 2019

09:25 AM(ET)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT CHATTANOOGA

Brenden Isom, ) Docket No.: 2019-01-0545

Employee, )

V. )

Cherokee Truck Equipment, LLC, ) State File No.: 53284-2019

Employer, )

And )

Bridgefield Casualty Ins. Co., ) Judge Audrey A. Headrick

Insurance Company. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

(DECISION ON THE RECORD)

This case came before the Court on Brenden Isom’s Request for an Expedited

Hearing on the record.’ Mr. Isom requested medical and temporary disability benefits for

a left-arm injury. Cherokee Truck denied his claim for violation of its Drug-Free Work

Place policy. The issue is whether Mr. Isom is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits

in rebutting the presumption that his illegal drug use proximately caused his injury. For

the reasons below, the Court holds he is not.

History of Claim

On July 25, 2019, Mr. Isom fractured his arm when he fell approximately five feet

from a stand while painting a truck for Cherokee Truck. Cherokee Truck denied Mr.

Isom’s claim on July 31 for violation of its DFWP policy after he tested positive for

marijuana on his post-accident drug tests.

' The Court issued a docketing notice allowing the parties until November 15 to file objections or submit

position statements. The docketing notice also allowed Cherokee Truck until November 15 to submit

additional evidence.

Mr. Isom testified by affidavit that he smoked marijuana in his home four days

before his accident but disputed that his drug use had anything to do with his accident.’

Lekh Sharma, PhD, TC (NRCC), the director of a toxicology lab, testified by

affidavit. Dr. Sharma stated the post-accident drug tests did not “confirm[ed]

intoxication.” She indicated that “[uJrine drug screens are inherently unreliable to

determine intoxication at or near the time of the test.” Dr. Sharma provided an opinion

that “no presumption should be drawn from these drug screen tests . . . regarding whether

an individual was or was not intoxicated at or near the time the test was taken.” She also

stated that “the test results . . . are not inconsistent with use of marijuana four or more

days prior to the test being taken for the reasons mentioned herein.”

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Standard Applied

Mr. Isom must present sufficient evidence from which the Court can determine he

is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2019).

The Court holds he did not.

Analysis

No one disputed that Cherokee Truck was part of Tennessee’s DF WP, and Mr.

Isom’s drug tests were positive for marijuana. Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-

110(c)(1) affords a presumption that Mr. Isom’s drug use was the “proximate cause” or a

substantial factor in producing his injury. However, Mr. Isom may rebut this

presumption by “clear and convincing evidence,” which means “there is no serious or

substantial doubt about the correctness of the conclusions drawn from the evidence.”

Kizer v. Express Servs., Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 17, at *10 (Apr. 20,

2018). For the following reasons, the Court finds Mr. Isom did not rebut the presumption

that his drug use caused his injury.

Mr. Isom’s proof is twofold: (1) his own testimony that he was not impaired at the

time of his accident; and, (2) his toxicology expert’s opinion that the drug tests did not

confirm intoxication due to the unreliability of urine tests. However, Mr. Isom’s

testimony that he was not impaired is insufficient to rebut the presumption that the drug

use was the proximate cause of his accident. Dr. Sharma’s opinion is also insufficient.

Despite Dr. Sharma’s opinion about urine tests, Mr. Isom did not present evidence to

show that Cherokee Truck’s drug-testing did not fully comply with the DF WP rules that

govern the process. Likewise, Dr. Sharma’s equivocal opinion that the drug tests did not

? The Court sustained Cherokee Truck’s hearsay objection to statements contained in Mr. Isom’s affidavit

allegedly made by Cherokee Truck employees.

confirm intoxication falls short of clear and convincing evidence to rebut the

presumption. Therefore, the Court holds Mr. Isom is not likely to prevail at a hearing on

the merits in rebutting the presumption by clear and convincing evidence that his illegal

drug use proximately caused his injury.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. The Court denies Mr. Isom’s request.

2. This case is set for a Status Hearing on Wednesday, January 22, 2020, at 10:30

a.m. Eastern Time. The parties must call (423) 634-0164 or toll-free at (855) 383-

0001 to participate. Failure to call may result in a determination of the issues

without your participation.

ENTERED November 20, 2019.

Qu Snorrdoc Li

AUDREY A. HEADRICK

Workers’ Compensation Judge

Exhibits:

Pe SA eh ee

APPENDIX

Form C-20 First Report

Form C-23 Notice of Denial

Form C-41 Wage Statement

Form C-42 Panel

Quest Diagnostics Laboratory Report, July 25, 2019

Medical records of American Family Care

Medical records of Dr. Brett Sanders

Affidavit of Lekh Sharma, PhD, TC (NRCC)

Affidavit of Brenden K. Isom

10. DFWP documents

11. Personnel documents

Technical record:

l.

2

3.

4

Petition for Benefit Determination

. Dispute Certification Notice

Request for Expedited Hearing

. Cherokee Truck Equipment’s Motion to Extend Objection to Request for a

Decision on the Record Deadline

Objection of Brenden Isom to Cherokee Truck Equipment’s Motion to Extend

Objection to Request for a Decision on the Record Deadline

. Order Granting Motion to Extend Objection to Request for a Decision on the

Record Deadline

Cherokee Truck Equipment’s Notice of No Objection to a Decision on the

Record

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on November 20, 2019.

Name Certified | Email | Service sent to:

Mail

Mike Wagner, Xx maw(@wagnerinjury.com

Employee’s Attorney

Nick Peterson, xX nick.peterson@petersonwhite.com

Employer’s Attorney

p vy re) tan Lua marry)

PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK |"

we.courtclerk(@tn.gov

aE

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the

form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven

business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice

of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau's

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of

the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file

it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both

parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’

Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof

concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be

a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten

business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The

party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business

days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a

Statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the

expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of

the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an

argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litiganis: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

LB8-1099 rev. 10/18 Page 1 of 2

EXPEDITED HEARING NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Division of Workers’ Compensation

JWaww.tr.pow/labor-wid/weamp shtml

we.courtclerk@tn.gav

1-800-332-2667

Docket #:

State File #/YR:

Employee

Vv.

Employer

Notice

Notice is given that

{List name(s) of all appealing party(ies) on separate sheet if necessary]

appeals the order(s) of the Court of Workers’ Com pensation Claims at

to the Warkers’ Compensation Appeals

Board, [List the date(s) the order(s) was filed in the court clerk’s office]

Judge

Statement of the Issues

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

Additionai Information

Type of Case [Check the most appropriate item]

C] Temporary disability benefits

{1 Medical benefits for current injury

QO) Medical benefits under prior order issued by the Court

List of Parties

Appellant (Requesting Party):

Address:

Party’s Phone: Emait:

At Hearing: DEmployer DEmployee

Attorney’s Name: BPR#:

Attorney's Address: Phone:

Attorney's City, State & Zip code:

Attorney’s Email:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

RDA 11082

Emplayee Name: SF#: Dol:

Abpellee(s)

Appellee (Opposing Party): At Hearing: Employer Employee

Appellee’s Address:

Appellee’s Phone: Email:

Attorney’s Name: BPR#:

Attorney's Address: Phone:

Attorney's City, State & Zip cade:

Attorney’s Email:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, , certify that | have forwarded a true and exact copy of this

Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal by First Class, United States Mall, postage prepaid, to all parties

and/or thelr attorneys in this case in accordance with Rule 0800-02-22.01(2) of the Tennessee Rules

of Board of Workers’ Compensation Appeals on this the day of ,20__

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099_ rev. 10/18 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

220 French Landing Drive, I-B

Nashville, TN 37243-1002

800-332-2667

h

AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY

, having been duly swom according to law, make oath that

because of my poverty, | am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be

waived. The following facts support my poverty.

4. Full Name:

3. Telephone Number:

5. Names and Ages of All Dependents:

6. | am employed by:

2. Address:

4, Date of Birth:

Relationship;

Relationship:

Relationship:

Relationship:

My employer's address Is:

My employer's phone number is:

7, My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:

$

8. | receive or axpect to receive money fram the following sources:

AFDC $

SS $

Retirement $

Disability $

Unemployment $

Worker's Comp.$

Other $

LB-1108 (REV 11/15)

per month

per month

per month

per month

per month

per month

per month

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

RDA 11082

9. My expenses are:

RenttHouse Payment $ permonth Medical/Dental § per month

Groceries $ per month Telephona $ per month

Electricity $_ sper month School Supplies $ per month

Water $ per month Clothing $ per month

Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month

Transportation $ per month Child Support $_ —. per month

Car $ per month

Other $ per manth (describe: )

10. Assets:

Automobile 3 (FMV)

Checking/Savings Acct. §

House $ (FMV)

Other $ Destribe:

11. My debts are:

Amount Owed To Whom

thereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answors are true, correct, and complete

and that | am financially unable to pay the costs of this appaal.

APPELLANT

Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this

day of ,20

NOTARY PUBLIC

My Commission Expires!

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.