Opinion

Bratcher, Deborah v. Yates Services, LLC

  • 2019 TN WC 130
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Aug 27, 2019
Status
Published
On the bench
Dale Tipps
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MURFREESBORO

DEBORAH BRATCHER, ) Docket No. 2019-05-0373

Employee, )

V. )

)

YATES SERVICES, LLC, ) State File No. 21633-2018

Employer, )

And )

)

TRAVELERS INDEM. CO., ) Judge Dale Tipps

Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING REQUESTED BENEFITS

This case came before the Court on August 22, 2019, for an Expedited Hearing on

whether Ms. Bratcher is entitled to additional medical or temporary disability benefits.

To receive these benefits, Ms. Bratcher must be likely to establish at a hearing on the

merits that her time off work and her need for additional medical treatment arose

primarily out of and in the course and scope of her employment. For the reasons below,

the Court holds Ms. Bratcher failed to meet this burden and is not entitled to the

requested benefits at this time.

History of Claim

Ms. Bratcher suffered a work injury on March 19, 2018. Yates accepted the injury

and provided treatment for her neck and shoulder pain. Her first authorized provider,

Premise Health, ordered shoulder and neck MRIs. It then treated Ms. Bratcher with anti-

inflammatory medication and physical therapy before referring her to an orthopedist.

Yates provided an orthopedic panel, and Ms. Bratcher selected Dr. Timothy

Steinagle. He first saw her on June 6 for complaints of right-shoulder pain. He noted the

cervical MRI was normal, but the shoulder MRI showed mild tendinosis of the rotator

cuff with no evidence of a tear. Dr. Steinagle saw no evidence of nerve root

impingement and diagnosed rotator cuff strain. He administered an injection, referred

1

Ms. Bratcher to physical therapy, and assigned light-duty restrictions.

Ms. Bratcher returned to Dr. Steinagle on July 19 and reported no improvement.

He noted full range of motion and good strength and concluded, “Mild rotator cuff

tendinosis seen on MRI with no evidence of underlying tear or surgical pathology. Has

completed an adequate amount of treatment for work related RC tendonitis. Continued

subjection complaint of shoulder pain and dysfunction not substantiated by objective

physical findings.” He also noted preexisting arthritis of the AC joint.’ Dr. Steinagle

concluded that he had nothing further to offer Ms. Bratcher and released her. He added,

“She may follow up with her personal physician for evaluation and treatment of

preexisting AC arthritis.”

Ms. Bratcher sought treatment on her own from other providers and introduced

several partial medical records at the hearing.” One of these is a February 5, 2019 return-

to-work form signed by Dr. Jonathan Head, which noted, “Patient’s shoulder and chest

pain is probably work related.” In Ms. Bratcher’s FMLA forms, Dr. Head also checked

“yes” to the question, “Is the disability work related?” She further introduced a March 11

MRI report from Nashville General Hospital that states, “Question tiny avulsion of the

supraspinatus tendon footprint and small labral tear.”

Ms. Bratcher testified that she returned to work after Dr. Steinagle released her but

eventually requested FMLA leave because of her continuing neck and shoulder problems.

Yates terminated her employment after the leave expired. She requested that the Court

order Yates to provide additional medical treatment and temporary disability benefits.

Yates contended that it accepted Ms. Bratcher’s claim and provided all benefits to

which she is entitled. It argued she failed to prove she is likely to establish that her need

for any additional treatment arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of her

employment. For these reasons, it asked the Court to deny her request.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Ms. Bratcher must provide sufficient evidence from which this Court might

determine she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-

239(d)(1) (2018); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App.

Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). To prove a compensable injury, Ms. Bratcher

must show that her alleged injury arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of

her employment. To do so, she must show, “to a reasonable degree of medical certainty

that it contributed more than fifty percent (50%) in causing the . . . disablement or need

"Dr. Steinagle also assessed noncompliance because he understood that Ms. Bratcher failed to attend her

therapy sessions. Ms. Bratcher denied this. She testified convincingly that she requested the rescheduling

of the fourth week of therapy and eventually completed it.

* The Court summarizes only the relevant medical records.

2

for medical treatment, considering all causes.” “Shown to a reasonable degree of medical

certainty” means that, in the opinion of the treating physician, it is more likely than not

considering all causes as opposed to speculation or possibility. See Tenn. Code Ann. §

50-6-102(14).

Yates does not dispute that an injury occurred. The question, therefore, is whether

Ms. Bratcher appears likely to prove at a hearing on the merits that her work injury

primarily caused her current symptoms or need for treatment. The Court cannot find at

this time that she is likely to meet this burden.

The Court accepted several medical records into evidence. Yates relied on Dr.

Steinagle’s conclusions that: 1) Ms. Bratcher has completed an adequate amount of

treatment for her work-related tendonitis; 2) the objective physical findings do not

support her continued complaints; and 3) she suffers from preexisting AC joint arthritis.

Because Ms. Bratcher selected Dr. Steinagle from a panel of physicians, his opinion is

presumed correct. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(E). Thus, the question is

whether Ms. Bratcher submitted sufficient information to overcome this presumption.

To make this determination, the Court turns to the records of Dr. Head, the only

other physician to comment on the cause of Ms. Bratcher’s condition. He stated that her

shoulder and chest pain “is probably work related,” and he indicated on the FMLA form

that her disability was work-related. However, whether an injury is related to an

employee’s work is no longer the legal standard for determining compensability. Rather,

as noted above, the current statute requires proof that the injury arose primarily out of

and in the course and scope of employment. Thus, the fact that Dr. Head felt Ms.

Bratcher’s condition was related to her work is insufficient, without more, to overcome

the presumption of Dr. Steinagle’s opinion.

Ms. Bratcher appeared sincere in her belief that her work activities caused her

current condition. However, the Court must abide by the causation requirements of the

Workers’ Compensation Law and cannot infer from the mere existence of her condition

that it arose primarily out of her employment. Because Ms. Bratcher failed to present

any evidence that her current need for treatment arose primarily out of her work injury,

the Court cannot find at this time that she appears likely to prevail on a claim for

additional medical benefits.

Similarly, the Court must deny Ms. Bratcher’s request for temporary disability

benefits at this time because she has not yet demonstrated that the medical restrictions

that led to her termination arose primarily out of the work injury.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Ms. Bratcher’s claims against Yates and its workers’ compensation carrier for the

requested medical and temporary disability benefits are denied at this time.

2. This matter is set for a Scheduling Hearing on October 17, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. You

must call toll-free at 855-874-0473 to participate. Failure to call might result in a

determination of the issues without your further participation. All conferences are

set using Central Time.

ENTERED August 27, 2019.

ae IEF

Judge Dale Tipps

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

Affidavit of Deborah Bratcher

Records from Nashville General Hospital

Work note from Dr. Jonathan Head

Records from Dr. Timothy Steinagle

Wage Statement

Records from FNP Deborah Smith

Appointment reminders from Dr. Philip Elizondo

March 19, 2018 Form C-42

9. June 1, 2019 Form C-42

10. FMLA correspondence between Deborah Bratcher and Laurel Black

11. Disability Accommodation Request Form

12. Medical Release Forms

13. FMLA forms

CAINAMBYWNS

Technical record:

1. Petition for Benefit Determination

2. Dispute Certification Notice

3. Request for Expedited Hearing

4. Employer’s Position Statement

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was sent as indicated on

August 27, 2019.

Name Certified | Email | Service sent to:

Mail

Deborah Bratcher xX Genuinelyhonest803 @ gmail.com

John R. Rucker III, Esq. x john @ johnlewisattorney.com

Employer Attorney

a MU Mi “~

Penily Shruni,/Clerk of Court

Court of Wdyikers’ Compensation Claims

WC.CourtClerk @ th.gov

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the

form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven

business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice

of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of

the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file

it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both

parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’

Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof

concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be

a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten

business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The

party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business

days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a

statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the

expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of

the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an

argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

LB-1099

EXPEDITED HEARING NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Division of Workers’ Compensation

www. tn.gov/labor-wid/weomp.shtml

wce.courtclerk@tn.gov

1-800-332-2667

Docket #:

State File #/YR:

Employee

Vv.

Employer

Notice

Notice is given that

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies) on separate sheet if necessary]

appeals the order(s) of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims at

to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals

Board. [List the date(s) the order(s) was filed in the court clerk’s office]

Judge

Statement of the Issues

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

Additional Information

Type of Case [Check the most appropriate item]

L] Temporary disability benefits

L] Medical benefits for current injury

LC Medical benefits under prior order issued by the Court

List of Parties

Appellant (Requesting Party): At Hearing: LJEmployer LJEmployee

Address:

Party’s Phone: Email:

Attorney's Name: BPR#:

Attorney’s Address: Phone:

Attorney's City, State & Zip code:

Attorney’s Email:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

rev. 10/18 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: SF#: DOI:

Appellee(s)

Appellee (Opposing Party): At Hearing: L]JEmployer LJEmployee

Appellee’s Address:

Appellee’s Phone: Email:

Attorney’s Name: BPR#:

Attorney’s Address: Phone:

Attorney’s City, State & Zip code:

Attorney’s Email:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I,

Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal by First Class, United States Mail, postage prepaid, to all parties

and/or their attorneys in this case in accordance with Rule 0800-02-22.01(2) of the Tennessee Rules

of Board of Workers’ Compensation Appeals on this the day of , 20

, certify that | have forwarded a true and exact copy of this

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 10/18 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

220 French Landing Drive, I-B

Nashville, TN 37243-1002

800-332-2667

AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY

I, , having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that

because of my poverty, | am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be

waived. The following facts support my poverty.

1. Full Name: 2. Address:

3. Telephone Number: 4. Date of Birth:

5. Names and Ages of Ail Dependents:

Relationship:

Relationship:

Relationship:

Relationship:

6. lam employed by:

My employer’s address is:

My employer’s phone number is:

7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:

$

8. | receive or expect to receive money from the following sources:

AFDC $ per month beginning

ssl $ per month beginning

Retirement $ per month beginning

Disability $ per month beginning

Unemployment $ per month beginning

Worker's Comp.$ per month beginning

Other $ per month beginning

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

9. My expenses are:

Rent/House Payment $ permonth Medical/Dental $ per month

Groceries $ per month Telephone $ per month

Electricity $ per month School Supplies $ per month

Water $ per month Clothing $ per month

Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month

Transportation $ per month Child Support $ per month

Car $ per month

Other $ per month (describe: )

10. Assets:

Automobile $ (FMV)

Checking/Savings Acct. $

House $ __ (FMV)

Other $ Describe:

11. My debts are:

Amount Owed To Whom

| hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete

and that I am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal.

APPELLANT

Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this

day of , 20

NOTARY PUBLIC

My Commission Expires:

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.