Opinion

Nowlin, Jennifer v. Lowes Home Centers

  • 2019 TN WC 86
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
May 30, 2019
Status
Published
On the bench
Lisa A. Lowe
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

May 30, 2019

10:41 AM(ET)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT KNOXVILLE

JENNIFER NOWLIN, ) Docket No. 2019-03-0012

Employee, )

)

V. ) State File No. 82431-2018

LOWES HOME CENTERS, )

Employer. )

) Judge Lisa A. Lowe

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING BENEFITS

Decision on the Record

This case came before the Court on Ms. Nowlin’s Request for Expedited Hearing

seeking a decision on the record. Lowes Home Centers (Lowes) did not object to a

decision on the record.' Ms. Nowlin seeks payment of her outstanding medical bills,

temporary disability benefits, authorized treatment with Dr. Daniel Cordas, and

attorney’s fees. The issue is whether Ms. Nowlin is likely to prevail at a hearing on the

merits on entitlement to these benefits by establishing causation. For the reasons below,

the Court holds Ms. Nowlin is not likely to prevail and she is not entitled to the requested

benefits.

Ms. Nowlin’s Contentions

Ms. Nowlin worked for Lowes as a fulfillment coordinator pulling items from the

shelves for online orders and taking them to either the delivery or pick-up bay. She

alleged that on October 12, 2018, a customer came in to pick up a microwave.

In her affidavit, Ms. Nowlin noted that the microwave was placed on top of a

refrigerator. As she attempted to pull the microwave down, it was much heavier than

expected and jerked her arm down, pinning her arm between the microwave and

' The Court issued a Docketing Notice allowing the parties until May 17 to object to any exhibits and to

file position statements. Lowes filed a position statement, but Ms. Nowlin did not. The Court holds it

needs no additional information to issue a decision on the record.

1

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

refrigerator. Ms. Nowlin stated she felt immediate right-shoulder pain that progressed as

she finished her shift. However, she did not report her injury until a day or two later

during a “sync up” meeting with her supervisor, Candace Reed.

Ms. Reed provided a panel of physicians, and Ms. Nowlin chose LeConte Medical

Center for initial treatment. She saw Dr. Darin Hale at LeConte on October 23 and

complained that she fell at work about two days ago. He diagnosed right-shoulder injury

and right cervical radiculopathy. He instructed her to follow up with her primary care

physician within the week and assigned restrictions of avoiding heavy lifting and

strenuous activity.

Ultimately, Ms. Nowlin came under the care of Dr. Daniel Cordas, an

orthopedist. Dr. Cordas’s records revealed that her chief complaint continued to be right

shoulder and neck pain with radiation and numbness into her right hand. He made

multiple diagnoses and injected Ms. Nowlin’s shoulder but noted no improvement. He

restricted her from working for one week and recommended a cervical spine MRI.

Lowes declined to authorize the MRI and denied the claim. Lowes subsequently fired

Ms. Nowlin for poor attendance.

Ms. Nowlin seeks reimbursement for out-of-pocket medical expenses. She also

requested temporary partial disability benefits, since she remains under restrictions.

Additionally, Ms. Nowlin asked for continued authorized treatment with Dr. Cordas and

attorney’s fees.

Lowes’s Contentions

Lowes argued that Ms. Nowlin is not entitled to benefits because she failed to

establish that she sustained an injury arising primarily from her employment at a specific

date and time. Ms. Nowlin gave inconsistent descriptions of her injury and conflicting

accounts of when she reported it. On October 23, Ms. Nowlin completed a handwritten

report that contradicts her affidavit testimony. In the report, Ms. Nowlin said she was

picking up a microwave box, lost her grip, and her hand got pinned under the box. She

also said she “never thought much about it until last week.”

Ms. Reed stated in her affidavit that, contrary to Ms. Nowlin’s assertions, the only

“syne up” meeting happened on October 29, not a day or two after the alleged injury.

Lowes also submitted an email containing a statement from its Loss Prevention Manager,

Ian Pastorius, which contained the following:

On Thursday, 10/25 around 8:00 a.m., I spoke to [Ms. Nowlin] about her

arm. She said she hurt it pulling a microwave earlier that week in

receiving. I asked her what time the incident took place and she did not

know. I pulled the microwave sales of the date and there were none found.

2

I also pulled the sales on 10/12/2018 and there were no microwave sales

that day either. Jennifer said the incident took place in the PL bay in

receiving. There is no video of that area or at customer service with a

microwave. She said there were no employees around receiving to see the

incident take place.

Lowes also provided a statement from an employee, Cameron Netherland, who stated he

was with Ms. Nowlin in the pick-up bay moving orders around and cleaning. He stated

he moved all boxes and items and did not recall Ms. Nowlin moving anything or

becoming injured.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Ms. Nowlin must present sufficient evidence to prove she is likely to prevail at a

hearing on the merits. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp.

App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015); Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2018).

Ms. Nowlin must show she suffered an accidental injury that was “caused by a specific

incident, or set of incidents, arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of

employment, and is identifiable by time and place of occurrence.” Tenn. Code Ann. §

50-6-102(14).

Here, the threshold issue is whether Ms. Nowlin came forward with sufficient

evidence to establish the occurrence of a specific incident on October 12, 2018,

identifiable by time and place of occurrence. For the reasons below, the Court holds she

did not.

Ms. Nowlin’s affidavit indicated she injured her shoulder and right arm on

October 12, 2018, when retrieving a microwave and that her right arm was pinned

between the microwave and a refrigerator. She stated she felt immediate pain and

reported the injury a day or two later during a “sync up” meeting. In Ms. Nowlin’s

handwritten October 23 statement, she said she was picking up a microwave box, lost her

grip, and her hand got pinned under the box. She said she “never thought much about it

until last week and it’s really hurting bad[ly] now and going down my shoulder and arm.”

In contrast, Ms. Reed denied a sync-up meeting took place until October 29 and

stated that Ms. Nowlin reported the injury on October 23, not a day or two following the

alleged incident. Lowes’s Loss Prevention Manager said there were no microwaves sold

on October 12, the date Ms. Nowlin claimed her injury occurred, and Mr. Netherland

worked with Ms. Nowlin that date and did not recall her moving anything or becoming

injured. Further, the October 23 LeConte Medical Center note indicated Ms. Nowlin

injured her shoulder at work about two days earlier.

Ms. Nowlin made inconsistent statements about how and when the injury occurred

and when she experienced pain and radiating symptoms. She also made conflicting

statements about when she reported the injury. These inconsistencies call into question

her credibility. Based on those inconsistencies and the refuting statements of Lowes’s

witnesses, the Court concludes that Ms. Nowlin failed to come forward with sufficient

evidence to prove likelihood of success at trial in establishing she sustained a specific

work-related incident identifiable by time and place of occurrence.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

I.

Ms. Nowlin’s claim against Lowes Home Centers is denied at this time.

2. This case is set for a Scheduling Hearing on July 30, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.

Eastern Time. The parties must call (865) 594-0109 or (toll-free) (855) 383-0003

to participate in the Scheduling Hearing. Failure to appear by telephone may

result in a determination of the issues without your further participation.

ENTERED on May 30, 2019.

Wie A. Wunwue

LISA A. LOWE, JUDGE

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

I.

fe oe PS ge bo

9.

Affidavit of Jennifer Nowlin

Lowes Home Centers Workers’ Compensation Employee Statement

Wage Statement, Form C-41

Separation Notice

Employee’s Choice of Physician, Form C-42

Medical Records of LeConte Medical Center

Medical Records of Dr. Daniel Cordas, Smoky Mountain Orthopedics

Medical Expense from Jack Hughston Memorial Hospital

Medical Expenses of Wal-Mart Pharmacy

10. Docketing Notice for On-The-Record Determination

11. Lowes’s Response to Employee’s Request for Expedited Hearing

12. Affidavit of Terrence Woodley

13. Statement of Ian Pastorius

14. Affidavit of Candace Reed

Technical Record:

1. Petition for Benefit Determination

2. Dispute Certification Notice

3. Request for Expedited Hearing

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a correct copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was sent to the

following recipients as indicated below on May 30, 2019.

Employer’s Attorney

Name Certified | Fax | Email | Service sent to:

Mail

Jonathan Doolan, X | jonathan@collinsdoolan.com

Employee’s Attorney

/C. Christopher Brown, | x chris.brown@leitnerfirm.com

—

j

\ eee, $s Shore xl pin 4.2..0n

PENNY SHRUM, Court Clerk Kany

WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

EXPEDITED HEARING NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Division of Workers’ Compensation

www.th.gov/labor-wid/weomp. shtml

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

1-800-332-2667

Docket #:

State File #/YR:

Employee

V.

Employer

Notice

Notice is given that

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies) on separate sheet if necessary]

appeals the order(s) of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims at

to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals

Board. [List the date(s) the order(s) was filed in the court clerk’s office]

Judge

Statement of the Issues

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

Additional Information

Type of Case [Check the most appropriate item]

L1 Temporary disability benefits

L] Medical benefits for current injury

L] Medical benefits under prior order issued by the Court

List of Parties

Appellant (Requesting Party): At Hearing: LlEmployer LJEmployee

Address:

Party’s Phone: Email:

Attorney’s Name: BPR#:

Attorney's Address: Phone:

Attorney's City, State & Zip code:

Attorney's Email:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev, 10/18 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: __ SF#: DOI:

Appellee(s)

Appellee (Opposing Party): At Hearing: L]Employer LlEmployee

Appellee’s Address:

Appellee’s Phone: Email:

Attorney’s Name: BPR#:

Attorney’s Address: Phone:

Attorney’s City, State & Zip code:

Attorney's Email:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, , certify that | have forwarded a true and exact copy of this

Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal by First Class, United States Mail, postage prepaid, to all parties

and/or their attorneys in this case in accordance with Rule 0800-02-22.01(2) of the Tennessee Rules

of Board of Workers’ Compensation Appeals on this the day of , 20

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 10/18 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

220 French Landing Drive, I-B

Nashville, TN 37243-1002

800-332-2667

AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY

, having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that

because of my poverty, | am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be

waived. The following facts support my poverty.

1. Full Name:

3. Telephone Number:

5. Names and Ages of All Dependents:

6. lam employed by:

2. Address:

4. Date of Birth:

Relationship:

Relationship:

Relationship:

Relationship:

My employer’s address is:

My employer’s phone number is:

7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:

$

8. | receive or expect to receive money from the following sources:

AFDC $

Ss! $

Retirement $

Disability $

Unemployment $

Worker's Comp.$

Other $

LB-1108 (REV 11/15)

per month

per month

per month

per month

per month

per month

per month

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

RDA 11082

9. My expenses are:

Rent/House Payment $ permonth Medical/Dental $ per month

Groceries $ per month Telephone $ per month

Electricity $ per month School Supplies $ per month

Water $ per month Clothing $ per month

Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month

Transportation $ per month Child Support $ per month

Car $ per month

Other $ per month (describe: )

10. Assets:

Automobile $ (FMV)

Checking/Savings Acct. $

House $ (FMV)

Other $ Describe:

11. My debts are:

Amount Owed To Whom

I hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete

and that | am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal.

APPELLANT

Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this

day of , 20

NOTARY PUBLIC

My Commission Expires:

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the

form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven

business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice

of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of

the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file

it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both

parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’

Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof

concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be

a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within fen

business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The

party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business

days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a

statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the

expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of

the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an

argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.