Opinion

Armstrong, Syvonia v. Chattanooga Billiard Club, Inc.

  • 2019 TN WC 22
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Feb 7, 2019
Status
Published
On the bench
Thomas Wyatt
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Feb 07, 2019

02:22 PM(ET)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT CHATTANOOGA

Syvonia Armstrong, ) Docket No.: 2018-01-0006

Employee, )

v. )

Chattanooga Billiard Club, Inc., ) State File No.: 927-2018

Employer, )

And )

Eastern Alliance Insurance Co., ) Judge Thomas Wyatt

Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING MEDICAL BENEFITS FOR

DENTAL CONDITIONS

This matter came before the Court on February 6, 2019, for an Expedited Hearing.

The primary issue is whether Ms. Armstrong came forward with evidence that she would

likely prevail at a hearing on the merits that her alleged dental injuries arose primarily out

of and in the course and scope of her employment. For the reasons below, the Court

holds she did not.

History of Claim

Ms. Armstrong worked as a bartender/shift leader for Chattanooga Billiards

Club's (CBC's) restaurant and bar. On December 12, 2017, she received an electrical

shock while changing a filter on a dishwasher. She stated she felt a sensation like bees

stinging her face and burning inside her mouth and on her right arm. She notified CBC's

owner of the incident, but declined the owner's offer to send her for immediate treatment.

Later that evening, Ms. Armstrong developed swollen and burned lips, bums

inside her mouth, pain in her left ear, and pain behind her left eye. She sought emergent

care without authorization and reported that she had "contact with electrical wire ... at

the right wrist" while ''working on a dishwasher." The emergency-room doctor

diagnosed an "electric shock" and discharged her without treatment.

1

Ms. Armstrong later sought medical benefits under workers' compensation.• CBC

referred her to its insurance broker, to whom Ms. Armstrong reported chipped teeth and

that an electrical shock "blew out her fillings." She testified the broker allowed her to see

a dentist, and she saw Dr. Drew Shabo on December 18.2 Dr. Shabo's examination

revealed several decayed and chipped teeth for which he recommended veneers. On the

issue of causation, Dr. Shabo's office note states, ''there's no way to know whether the

electric current caused the fracturing of the teeth" but "it is possible that the amalgam

fillings acted [as a] conductor and caused them to fracture but he hasn't seen her before to

know."

CBC later provided Ms. Armstrong a panel of walk-in clinics from which she

selected American Family Care (AFC). She saw physicians at AFC on January 9 and 12,

2018, who diagnosed burns of the mouth and pharynx and referred her to anENT. A

doctor who saw Ms. Armstrong at AFC on the second visit wrote that she became irate

during the visit, told him she did not want diagnoses of jaw pain, ear pain or headaches,

and threatened to sue if CBC did not pay for her treatment under workers'

compensation. 3 Both AFC physicians released her to return to work without restrictions.

Ms. Armstrong selected Dr. David Fortune from a panel for the ENT referral. Dr.

Fortune concluded the slight abnormalities on a hearing test were not those normally seen

with electrical shock injuries. He released her with ointment to treat a burn of the left

external ear canal and assigned no impairment or work restrictions.

CBC also offered Ms. Armstrong a panel of dentists. She refused to select a

dentist for authorized care, opting instead to pursue an order requiring CBC to pay for Dr.

Shabo's recommended care. During the hearing, she stated she made this decision

because she had a lot going on in her life and did not want to encounter the

inconvenience of seeing a new dentist.

CBC also had Ms. Armstrong examined by oral surgeon Dr. Richard L. Johnson.

He took dental x-rays revealing numerous decayed teeth, intact fillings, and chipping

consistent with normal wear. On causation, he stated that "I do not feel there is any

dental disability from [the electrical shock]."

1

Ms. Annstrong asked CBC to have the dishwasher inspected. CBC did so, once by a repainnan and then

by an electrician. Ms. Annstrong disagreed with the findings that nothing was wrong with the dishwasher

and refused to use the dishwasher. CBC tenninated her for this refusal and previous misconduct,

including tardiness.

2

CBC lodged a hearsay objection to Ms. Annstrong's testimony about the broker's authorization. Upon

consideration of Ms. Annstrong's testimony that she relied on the broker's statement in going to see Dr.

Shabo, the Court overruled the objection under the state-of-mind exception to the hearsay rule.

3

Ms. Annstrong testified she never saw the physician who wrote this.

2

Ms. Armstrong then obtained letters bearing Dr. Shabo's signature that addressed

causation. A September 5 letter stated: "Dr. Shabo concluded that the work that needs to

be done to save her teeth could very well be needed due to the electrical shock the patient

experienced." A September 19 letter stated: "Dr. Shabo concluded that, it is more likely

than not, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, the described injury 'electrical

shock' in dental notes was the primary cause of the need for dental treatment."

Ms. Armstrong filed a Petition for Benefit Determination seeking medical benefits

and temporary and permanent disability benefits. At the Expedited Hearing, she stated "I

only want my teeth fixed. I did not have chipped teeth before." CBC contended that Ms.

Armstrong failed to prove the essential elements of her claim, including causation and the

reasonableness, necessity and work-relatedness of requested treatment.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

At an expedited hearing, Ms. Armstrong must provide sufficient evidence from

which the Court can determine she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. McCord

v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9

(Mar. 27, 2015). Ms. Armstrong contends her dental problems arose primarily from the

electrical shock at CBC and relies on the opinions stated in Dr. Shabo's letters in support

of her claim. CBC argues that Dr. Shabo's opinions are unreliable because he changed

them over the course of time. It asserts that the Court should give greater weight to the

opinion of oral surgeon Dr. Johnson, who concluded that Ms. Armstrong's dental

conditions were not caused by an electrical shock.

Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-102(14) (2018) defines a compensable

injury as one "arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment."

Subsection 50-6-102(14)(C) requires that compensability be shown to "a reasonable

degree of medical certainty." Subsection 50-6-102(E) provides that the opinions of

treating physicians selected from a panel "shall be presumed correct on the issue of

causation but this presumption shall be rebuttable by a preponderance of the evidence."

Here, Dr. Fortune diagnosed Ms. Armstrong with a bum to her left external ear

canal and prescribed treatment. Thus, Ms. Armstrong established she would likely

prevail at a hearing on the merits regarding treatment for the bum. However, Ms.

Armstrong failed to come forward with evidence rebutting Dr. Fortune's opinion that her

hearing abnormalities were not related to the electrical shock. Thus, she failed to

establish entitlement to medical benefits for her hearing.

The compensability of the dental injuries hinges on the competing causation

testimonies of Dr. Shabo and Dr. Johnson. Their opinions stand on equal footing because

neither provider was selected from a panel.

3

In considering this issue, the Court notes that Dr. Shabo provided differing

causation opinions. In his treatment notes, he stated "there was no way to know whether

the electric current caused the fracturing of the teeth." At best, Dr. Shabo stated the

connection between the shock and the tooth damage was "possible," but he conceded he

would have needed to see Ms. Armstrong before the injury to consider a relationship

between the electrical shock and her dental conditions. 4

The Court finds the inconsistencies between Dr. Shabo's treatment notes and his

causation letters make the later opinions unreliable. The Court gives no weight to

causation opinions given after Dr. Shabo admitted he had insufficient information-the

chance to see Ms. Armstrong's teeth before the shock occurred-to give a valid opinion.

Thus, the only reliable causation opinion regarding the dental conditions is that of Dr.

Johnson, who concluded the conditions were not related to the electrical shock.

In view of the above, the Court holds Ms. Armstrong did not establish she would

likely prevail at a hearing on the merits that her dental conditions arose primarily out of

and in the course and scope of employment.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. CBC shall provide Ms. Armstrong reasonable and necessary medical care from

Dr. Fortune for the burn to her left ear canal.

2. Ms. Armstrong's claim for medical benefits for treatment of her dental conditions

is denied at this time.

3. This matter is set for a Status Hearing at 10:30 a.m. Eastern Time on April30,

2019. You must call (615) 741-3061 or toll-free at (855) 747-1721 to participate

in the Status Hearing. You must call in on the scheduled date/time to participate.

Failure to call in may result in a determination of the issues without your further

participation.

4. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed,

compliance with this Order must occur no later than seven business days

from the date of entry of this Order as required by Tennessee Code

Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3). The Insurer or Self-Insured Employer

must submit confirmation of compliance with this Order to the Bureau by

email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh business

day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary confirmation

4

An expert opinion connecting a physical condition to an employee's work must be stated on a more-

likely-than-not standard and not on the basis of speculation or possibility. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-

102(14)(0).

4

within the period of compliance may result in a penalty assessment for non-

compliance.

5. For questions regarding compliance, please contact the Workers' Compensation

Compliance Unit via email WCCompliance.Program@tn.g v.

ENTERED February 7, 2019.

~~~

Judge Thomas Wyatt

Court of Workers' Compensation Claims

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

I. Affidavit of Syvonia Armstrong

2. Correspondence in unemployment claim and earnings print-out (for

identification only)

3. Form from East Tennessee Endodontics (sustained hearsay objection)

4. Bill and Diagnosis Code from David Pifer, O.D. (sustained hearsay

objection on the bill; overruled hearsay objection on the diagnosis code

because the document was signed by the physician)

5. Medical records of Parkridge East Hospital; American Family Care; Dr.

Scott Fortune; Dr. Richard Johnson; and Dr. Drew Shabo; and Tennessee

Board of Dentistry disciplinary records on Dr. Drew Shabo. (overruled

hearsay objection on the fact the records are copies and not originals;

sustained hearsay objection on Dr. Shabo's bill; overruled objection that

Dr. Shabo's letters are not admissible upon signature because they are not

medical records and he is a dentist and not a doctor)

6. Text of text messages between Ms. Armstrong and CBC's owner

7. CBC disciplinary records and Separation Notice

8. Wage Statement and CBC's print-out of Ms. Armstrong's wages

9. Panels ofPhysicians

10.Affidavit ofMichael Wamack

11. Records of Sauder Electric and affidavit of Alex Westmoreland

12. Records of Auto-Chlor and affidavits of Clay Nelson and David Brockman

Technical record:

1. Petition for Benefit Determination

2. Dispute Certification Notice

3. Request for Expedited Hearing

5

4. Notice of Expedited Hearing

5. Motion to Compel IME and to Continue Expedited Hearing

6. Order Allowing IME and Continuing Expedited Hearing

7. Order Scheduling Expedited Hearing

8. Notice of Expedited Hearing

9. Employer's Witness and Exhibit List

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this Order was sent to the following

recipients by the following methods of service on February 7, 2019.

Name Certified First Email Service sent to:

Mail Class

Mail

Syvonia Armstrong, X X Syvoniamercedes72@gmail.com

Employee 2129 Dugan Avenue

Chattanooga, TN 37412

Pete Frech, X ppfrech@mijs.com

Employer Attorney jlrusso@mijs.com

9~ ~mj~

PENNY S UM, COURT CLE

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

6

Ex.=pedited Hearin g Order Ri ght to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers'

Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

I. Complete the enclosed form entitled: "Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal," and file the

form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers' Compensation Claims within seven

business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice

of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau's

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of lndigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of

the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file

it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both

parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers'

Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof

concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be

a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten

business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The

party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business

days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a

statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the

expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of

the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an

argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

EXPEDITED HEARING NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Division of Workers' Compensation

www.tn .gov/labor-wfd/wcomp.shtml

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

1-800-332-2667

Docket#: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

State File #/YR: - - -- - - -

Employee

v.

Employer

Notice

Notice is given that _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies) on separate sheet if necessary]

appeals the order(s) of the Court of Workers' Compensation Claims at _ __ _ _ __ _ __

to the Workers' Compensation Appeals

=--~~~-~~~~-~~~-~~~

Board. [List the date(s) the order(s) was filed in the court clerk's office]

Judge__________________________________________

Statement of the Issues

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal :

Additional Information

Type of Case [Check the most appropriate item]

0 Temporary disability benefits

0 Medical benefits for current injury

0 Medical benefits under prior order issued by the Court

list of Parties

Appellant (Requesting Party): _______________ At Hearing: OEmployer OEmployee

Address:, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Party's Phone: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Email:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Attorney's Name:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ BPR#: - - - - - - - -

Attorney's Address: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ Phone:

Attorney's City, State & Zip code: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Attorney's Email:,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant*

LB-1099 rev. 10/18 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _ __ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ SF#: _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ DOl : _ _ _ _ __

Appellee(s)

Appellee (Opposing Party)·...__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ At Hearing: DEmployer DEmployee

Appellee's Address : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Appellee's Phon e,_

: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Email :._ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _

Attorney's Name, _ : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BPR#: - - - - - - - -

Attorney's Address,_:- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Phone: _ _ __ _ __ _

Attorney's City, State & Zip code: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Attorney's Email. , _ : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, certify that I have forwarded a true and exact copy of this

Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal by First Class, United States Mail, postage prepaid, to all parties

and/or their attorneys in this case in accordance with Rule 0800-02-22.01(2) of the Tennessee Rules

of ijoard of Workers' Compensation Appeals on this the day of , 20

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 10/18 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

Tennessee Bureau of Workers' Compensation

220 French Landing Drive, 1-B

Nashville, TN 37243-1002

800-332-2667

AFFlDAVIT OF INDIGENCY

I, , having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that

because of my poverty, I am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be

waived. The following facts support my poverty.

1. Full Name:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

2. Address: - - - - - -- - - - - -

3. Telephone Number: _ _ _ _ __ _ __ 4. Date of Birth: - - - - -- - - - - -

5. Names and Ages of All Dependents:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - -- - -

- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - Relationship: - - - - - -- - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - -- - - - - - - --

6. I am employed by: - - - - -- - - - - - -- - -- -

My employer's address Is: - - - - - - -- - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - -

My employer's phone number is: - - - - - - - - -- -- - -- - -- - - - -

7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:

$ _ _ _ _ _ __

8. I receive or expect to receive money from the following sources:

AFDC $ per month beginning

SSI $ per month beginning

Retirement $ per month beginning

Disability $ per month beginning __

Unemployment $ per month beginning

Worker's Comp.$ per month beginning

Other $ per month beginning

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

9. My expenses are:

RenUHouse Payment $ per month Medical/Dental $ per month

Groceries $ per month Telephone $ per month

Electricity $ per month School Supplies $ per month

Water $ per month Clothing $ per month

Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month

Transportation $ per month Child Support $ per month

Car $ per month

Other $ per month (describe:

10. Assets:

Automobile $ _ _ __

(FMV) - - - - - -- ---

Checking/Savings Acct. $ _ _ _ __

House $ _ _ _ __

(FMV) - - - - - - - - -

Other $ _ _ _ __ Describe:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

11. My debts are:

Amount Owed To Whom

I hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete

and that I am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal.

/(P'PELLANT

Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this

_ _ _ day of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , 20._ _ _.

NOTARY PUBLIC

My Commission Ext;iir~~~ --------

LB-11 08 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.