Opinion

Engstrom, Katerina v. Chattanooga Billiards Club

  • 2019 TN WC 15
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Jan 27, 2019
Status
Published
On the bench
Thomas Wyatt
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

tee a

fe ruP BS.

zi <i AGRICL RE ie H

Wes pea f ge 2

TENNESSE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT CHATTANOOGA

Katerina Engstrom, ) Docket No.: 2018-01-0404 | FIRED

Employee, ) Less AMCED)

Vv. ) WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

Chattanooga Billiards Club, ) State File No.: 25193-2018 “

Employer, )

And )

Eastern Alliance Insurance Group, ) Judge Thomas Wyatt

Carrier, )

and )

Abigail Hudgens, Administrator of the )

Bureau of Workers’ Compensation )

Subsequent Injury and Vocational )

Recovery Fund. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER (DECISION ON THE RECORD)

This matter came before the Court on January 23, 2019, upon Katerina Engstrom’s

Request for Expedited Hearing seeking medical benefits for bilateral knee and

psychological injuries.’ Chattanooga Billiards Club (CBC) defended on the ground that

Ms. Engstrom failed to establish that her alleged injuries arose primarily out of and in the

course and scope of employment. For the reasons below, the Court holds that Ms.

Engstrom will likely prevail in a hearing on the merits in her claim for medical benefits

for her bilateral knee injuries but will not likely do so as to psychiatric care.

History of Claim

Ms. Engstrom, a manager of CBC’s bar and restaurant, alleged she slipped on a

wet floor and fell onto both knees in April 2018. Co-worker Thomas Braxton stated that

he observed Ms. Engstrom fall backward onto her elbow without striking her knees on

anything, and that she held her elbow after the fall.

"Ms. Engstrom asked for a decision on the record, to which no one objected.

1

CBC accepted Ms. Engstrom’s injury as compensable and authorized treatment at

a walk-in clinic. The physician at the walk-in clinic referred her to an orthopedist in

May, when she selected Dr. Michael Tew from a panel.

Ms. Engstrom told Dr. Tew that she underwent arthroscopic surgeries of both

knees in 1999, but she related her current pain to “a slip and fall at work May °18 landing

on both knees.”” After obtaining MRIs, Dr. Tew diagnosed fractures of the upper end of

her right tibia, a “spontaneous disruption of [the] anterior cruciate ligament of [the] right

knee,” and an “arthritic bone bruise [in the left] patella.”

On June 27, Dr. Tew checked “YES” to the following question from Ms.

Engstrom’s counsel: “As per the above-cited ‘greater than 50%’ standard, did Ms.

Engstrom’s April 5, 2018 fall at work onto her bilateral extremities aggravate,

exacerbate, or advance her pre-existing lower extremity condition and the need for

treatment?” Dr. Tew performed authorized knee surgeries in July and November.

On July 11, Dr. Tew recorded that Ms. Engstrom “is getting depressed and has

been placed on Prozac[.]” He made a “psychiatry referral for exacerbation of psych

issues since her knee injury,” since he could not treat this condition. He wrote “she wants

to see a different psychiatrist from the VA doctor.”

CBC initially filed a Notice of Denial of the alleged psychiatric injury, claiming

that it did not arise primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment. In July

and October, CBC provided different panels of psychiatrists that Ms. Engstrom rejected

due to the fact that some of the listed providers were unwilling to accept workers’

compensation patients and others practiced outside her community.

Ms. Engstrom tired of the delay in obtaining a psychiatry panel and sought care on

her own. In late November, Dr. M. Aslam Sandvi agreed to accept her as a patient. Ms.

Engstrom saw him on December 10 and paid for the treatment herself.

Dr. Sandvi noted that Ms. Engstrom expressed feelings of hopelessness and

helplessness, high levels of anxiety, and periodic panic attacks. Ms. Engstrom told him

about post-traumatic stress disorder, with periodic flashbacks and nightmares, from the

military assault for which she began receiving treatment through the Veterans

Administration in June 2018. He also noted Ms. Engstrom’s reported preoccupation with

chronic pain in her knees and workers’ compensation problems. He further recorded that

she verbalized anger and frustration about mistreatment by her employer and her

* Ms. Engstrom’s Veterans Administration records indicated she underwent arthroscopic surgeries on her

right knee in 1999 and 2013, and on her left knee in 2005 and 2013. Ms. Engstrom testified that she had

two right-knee surgeries and one left-knee surgery before her injury at CBC.

‘

=

difficulty in obtaining psychiatric treatment. Ms. Engstrom also told Dr. Sandvi that she

did not require psychiatric medication before her fall.°

Dr. Sandvi diagnosed recurrent severe major depression and generalized severe

anxiety, panic and severe post-traumatic stress disorders. He stated the following on

causation and treatment:

It is more likely than not (i.e. greater than 50%) that Ms. Engstrom’s

work related accident on April 5, 2018 exacerbated her pre-existing

psychiatric condition, necessitating additional mental health treatment

under worker’s compensation[.] She is receiving treatment for post-

traumatic stress disorder at the VA outpatient clinic. She will need

psychiatric treatment for her severe depression and anxiety disorder.

Dr. Sandvi prescribed medication and counseling to treat the work-related aspects of Ms.

Engstrom’s psychiatric condition.

CBC introduced Ms. Engstrom’s records from the VA, which indicated that she

sought knee treatment beginning April 12, 2016, when she complained of her knees being

painful, popping and giving way. The right knee was worse than the left. X-ray findings

included minimal to mild osteophytosis at the medial margin of the right tibial plateau

and minimal tricompartmental osteophytosis on the left.

In July 2016, Ms. Engstrom reported her right-knee pain made it difficult to walk.

An x-ray indicated no bony deformity, and an MRI showed degenerative changes related

to previous meniscal surgeries and a subchondral cyst in the medial tibial platform. Ms.

Engstrom underwent three right-knee injections. On January 18, 2018, the VA note

indicated she was considering right-knee-replacement surgery. A later note stated she

underwent an MRI after she fell at CBC. It revealed a moderate bone contusion and

nondisplaced trabecular fractures in the upper part of her right tibia.

As to psychiatric care, the VA records documented that Ms. Engstrom first sought

treatment on June 4, 2018, for daily panic attacks and anxiety related to her recent

attempt to process a sexual assault she suffered in the 1980s while in the military. The

VA did not record that Ms. Engstrom related her psychiatric symptoms at that time to

knee pain. On June 18, Ms. Engstrom reported that she suffered depression and anxiety

for several years because of the assault and twice considered suicide. VA providers

began her on a course of psychotropic medications including Trazadone.

On July 24, a VA provider noted that Ms. Engstrom complained because the

agency denied her disability benefits for the assault, writing that she said: “[w]hat upsets

3 The submitted VA records corroborate this statement.

3

me is that a person that sits at a desk . . . decided to tell me that there is nothing wrong

with me or if there is . . . it did not start with my assault. My whole life got messed up

from that experience.” The only mention in this note of Ms. Engstrom’s work injury

related to her intent to return to work after surgery.

A VA provider noted on August 17 that Ms. Engstrom was concerned that

problems with her left knee would derail her plan to return to work. She stated that

“waiting is very difficult” and expressed anger that the workers’ compensation carrier

only authorized eight physical therapy sessions. This complaint was in addition to

continuing complaints of depression and anxiety related to her assault. A VA note dated

September 11 documented that Ms. Engstrom reported “anger, frustration and

overwhelming sadness” because her boss treated her badly upon learning that she was

ready to come back to work.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Bilateral Knee Injuries

At an expedited hearing, Ms. Engstrom must provide sufficient evidence from

which the Court can determine she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. McCord

v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9

(Mar. 27, 2015). CBC contended that Ms. Engstrom has not met that burden as to the

cause of her knee claim because of pre-existing conditions and contradictory testimony as

to whether she struck her knees when she fell.

Regarding the contradictory testimony, CBC relied solely on the declaration of

Mr. Braxton that he observed Ms. Engstrom fall without striking her knees. In her

recorded statement, she stated that she struck her knees when she fell, and she repeated

the same history to Dr. Tew. The Court accepts Ms. Engstrom’s testimony regarding the

mechanism of her fall because she gave consistent accounts in her recorded statement and

to Dr. Tew.

On causation, Dr. Tew is the only physician who gave a specific opinion, and he

related her bilateral knee injuries to her fall at CBC. As the treating physician, his

opinion is entitled to a presumption of correctness. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-012(14)(E)

(2018). The Court notes that the post-injury MRI of Ms. Engstrom’s right knee revealed

fractures not present in pre-injury MRIs. The VA records did not rebut Dr. Tew’s

opinion that the fall at work primarily aggravated, exacerbated or advanced her bilateral

knee conditions. Thus, the Court holds that Ms. Engstrom will likely prevail at trial in

establishing that her bilateral knee injuries arose primarily out of and in the course and

scope of employment.

Psychological Injury

Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-102(17) defines a compensable mental

injury as “a loss of mental faculties or a mental or behavioral disorder, arising primarily

out of a compensable physical injury[.]” In view of this definition and the evidence in

the record, the Court holds Ms. Engstrom will likely not prevail at trial in establishing

that her need for psychiatric care arose primarily out of her compensable physical injury.

The record of psychiatric treatment she underwent through the VA—almost all of

which she related to her sexual assault—dilutes the weight of Dr. Sandvi’s opinion that

Ms. Engstrom’s fall primarily accounts for her current need for psychiatric care. Dr.

Sandvi’s report set forth that Ms. Engstrom’s psychiatric complaints relate in part to

chronic knee pain, much of which pre-dated her work injury, given that the VA

physicians discussed knee replacement with her before she fell at CBC. His report also

indicated Ms. Engstrom’s psychiatric symptoms relate in part to her boss’s mistreatment

of her when she attempted to return to work and to delays and uncertainties in her

workers’ compensation claim.

Under the definition on “mental injury” contained in section 50-6-102(17), an

employee cannot recover benefits for a “psychological or psychiatric response due to the

loss of employment or employment opportunities.” When Dr. Sandvi’s discussion of

non-work-related factors contributing to Ms. Engstrom’s mental condition is coupled

with the severe psychiatric symptoms she endured due to her sexual assault, the Court

cannot say that she will likely prevail in establishing entitlement to psychiatric care under

workers’ compensation.‘

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. CBC shall continue to authorize and pay for reasonable and necessary treatment of

Ms. Engstrom’s bilateral knee injuries under Dr. Tew’s care.

2. Ms. Engstrom’s psychological injury claim is denied at this time.

3. This matter is set for a Status Hearing on April 16, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern

Time. You must call (615) 741-3061 or toll-free at (855) 747-1721 to participate

in the Status Hearing. Failure to call may result in a determination of the issues

without your further participation.

4. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed,

compliance with this Order must occur no later than seven business days

* Due to this conclusion, the Court need not address issues raised by Ms. Engstrom related to CBC’s

provision of psychiatric-treatment panels.

from the date of entry of this Order as required by Tennessee Code

Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3). The Insurer or Self-Insured Employer

must submit confirmation of compliance with this Order to the Bureau by

email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh business

day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary confirmation

within the period of compliance may result in a penalty assessment for non-

compliance.

. For questions regarding compliance, please contact the Workers’ Compensation

Compliance Unit via email WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov.

ENTERED January 28, 2019.

Book Um

Judge Thomas Wyatt

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Affidavit of Katerina Engstrom

2. Form C42 Choice of Physicians form selecting Dr. Tew

3. Form C42 Choice of Physicians form listing psychiatrists (unsigned)

4. Form C42 Choice of Physicians form listing additional psychiatrists (unsigned)

5. Form C27-Notice of Controversy

6.

7

8

9.

1

Records of Fast Access Healthcare

. Records of Dr. Michael Tew

. Dr. Tew’s responses to causation questionnaire submitted by Ms. Engstrom

Receipt from Dr. M. Aslam Sandvi

0.CBC’s letter to Dr. Tew seeking responses regarding the causation of Ms.

Engstrom’s psychiatric condition (not responded to)

11.Employee’s discovery responses

12. Declaration of Thomas Braxton

13. Transcript of recorded statement of Ms. Engstrom

14.Records of Veterans Administration treatment

15.Records of Dr. M. Aslam Sandvi

Technical record:

Petition for Benefit Determination

Order and Authorization for Medical Records

Protective Order

Motion to Join Additional Party

Response to Motion for Joinder

Order of Joinder and Referral to Mediation

Dispute Certification Notice

Employee’s Additional Disputed Issues

. Employee’s Objection to Dispute Certification Notice

10. Request for Expedited Hearing (On-the-Record Determination)

11.Employee’s Witness List

12.Employee’s Brief

13. Docketing Notice for On-the-Record Determination

14. Fund Position Statement

15. Notice of Filing of Dr. Sandvi’s Records

16. Employer’s Expedited Hearing Brief

17.Employer’s Email Response to Question by the Court

18.Employee’s Supplemental Brief

19.Employer’s Exhibit List

20. Notice of Objection to VA Subpoena

ORPAINAMPWNS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was

sent to the following recipients by the following methods of service on January 28, 2019.

Name Certified Via Email Email Address

Mail

Jennifer Arnold xX jarnold(@arnold-lawyers.com

Employee Attorney

Alex Morrison X abmorrison@mijs.com

Chris Rowe cgrowe(@mijs.com

Employer Attorney

Ronald McNutt xX Ronald.mcnutt@tn.gov

Subsequent Injury

Fund

P pra h ruin wsfpernaaune-P

PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK |

we.courtclerk(@tn.gov

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

|. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the

form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven

business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice

of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. Ifa transcript of

the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file

it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both

parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’

Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof

concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be

a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten

business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The

party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business

days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a

statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the

expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of

the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an

argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

EXPEDITED HEARING NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Division of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/labor-wfd/wcomp.shtml

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

1-800-332-2667

Docket #:

State File #/YR:

Employee

Vv.

Employer

Notice

Notice is given that

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies) on separate sheet if necessary]

appeals the order(s) of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims at

to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals

Board. [List the date(s) the order(s) was filed in the court clerk’s office]

Judge

Statement of the Issues

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

Additional Information

Type of Case [Check the most appropriate item]

L] Temporary disability benefits

L] Medical benefits for current injury

Cl Medical benefits under prior order issued by the Court

List of Parties

Appellant (Requesting Party): At Hearing: (JEmployer DEmployee

Address:

Party’s Phone: Email:

Attorney’s Name: BPR#:

Attorney’s Address: Phone:

Attorney’s City, State & Zip code:

Attorney’s Email:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 10/18 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: SFH: DOI:

Appellee(s)

Appellee (Opposing Party): At Hearing: LJEmployer LJEmployee

Appellee’s Address:

Appellee’s Phone: Email:

Attorney's Name: BPR#:

Attorney’s Address: Phone:

Attorney’s City, State & Zip code:

Attorney’s Email:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, , certify that | have forwarded a true and exact copy of this

Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal by First Class, United States Mail, postage prepaid, to all parties

and/or their attorneys in this case in accordance with Rule 0800-02-22.01(2) of the Tennessee Rules

of Board of Workers’ Compensation Appeals on this the day of , 20

(Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 10/18 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

220 French Landing Drive, |-B

Nashville, TN 37243-1002

800-332-2667

AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY

, having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that

because of my poverty, | am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be

waived. The following facts support my poverty.

1. Full Name:

3. Telephone Number:

5. Names and Ages of All Dependents:

6. | am employed by:

2. Address:

4. Date of Birth:

Relationship:

Relationship:

Relationship:

Relationship:

My employer's address is:

My employer’s phone number is:

7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:

$

8. | receive or expect to receive money from the following sources:

AFDC $

SSI $

Retirement $

Disability $

Unemployment $

Worker's Comp.$

Other $

LB-1108 (REV 11/15)

per month

per month

per month

per month

per month

per month

per month

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

RDA 11082

9. My expenses are:

Rent/House Payment $ per month Medical/Dental $ per month

Groceries $ per month Telephone $ per month

Electricity $ per month School Supplies $ per month

Water $ per month Clothing $ per month

Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month

Transportation $ per month Child Support $ per month

Car $ per month

Other $ per month (describe: )

10. Assets:

Automobile $ (FMV)

Checking/Savings Acct. $

House $ (FMV)

Other $ Describe:

11. My debts are:

Amount Owed To Whom

| hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete

and that | am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal.

APPELLANT

Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this

day of ,20

NOTARY PUBLIC

My Commission Expires:

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.