Opinion

Chavez, Sonia Ree v. Fleetgistics Holdings, Inc.

  • 2018 TN WC 154
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Sep 25, 2018
Status
Published
On the bench
Kenneth M. Switzer
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Sep 25, 2018

07:15 AM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT NASHVILLE

Sonia Ree Chavez, ) Docket No. 2018-06-0643

Employee, )

v. )

Fleetgistics Holdings, Inc., ) State File No. 24722-2018

Employer, )

And )

Agri Gen. Ins. Co., ) Judge Kenneth M. Switzer

Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING REQUESTED RELIEF

The Court held an Expedited Hearing in this case on September 19, 2018. The

present focus is whether Sonia Chavez's termination relieved Fleetgistics Holdings, Inc.

of its obligation to pay temporary disability benefits. Because Fleetgistics reasonably

terminated Ms. Chavez for violation of its workplace expectations, her dismissal was

proper. Thus, the Court denies her request.

History of Claim

Ms. Chavez worked as an operations manager for Fleetgistics in its Nashville

location. On July 28, 20 17, she injured her back and neck at work. Fleetgistics accepted

the claim and authorized treatment. Providers placed Ms. Chavez on restrictions,

including no lifting greater than five pounds and no driving. After the injury, she

returned to work until October 26, when Fleetgistics terminated her.

Ms. Chavez testified that her job involved managing accounts for two major

clients, Advance Auto Parts and Network Healthcare. Her role was to recruit and

dispatch drivers to deliver freight to these businesses. She managed approximately sixty

drivers, who were all independent contractors.

According to Ms. Chavez, Fleetgistics decreased the pay available to independent

contractors in late 2014. This made it harder for her to recruit drivers. It also meant she

1

often ran routes herself when she was unable to find drivers. She worked nights and

weekends in an attempt to meet the clients' needs. A former Fleetgistics

driver/independent contractor, Kertrice Wright, corroborated Ms. Chavez's testimony

regarding the hours she worked and her difficulty finding drivers. Before her injury, Ms.

Chavez and Fleetgistics discussed her increasing difficulty in locating drivers.

Fleetgistics introduced three Performance Improvement Plans to support its

contention that Ms. Chavez did not meet her job requirements. One plan listed goals for

her to meet in October and December 2016, several months before the work injury.

Another contained goals for July and August 2017. The third, which Ms. Chavez never

signed, set goals for October 2017. The plans generally called for improvement with

drivers' tardiness, scanning deliveries in and out, and their overall professionalism. Ms.

Chavez acknowledged signing the first two Performance Improvement Plans but could

not recall the details of any conversations she had with Fleetgistics when she signed

them.

Concerning the Performance Improvement Plans, Ms. Chavez testified that

whenever she learned of drivers falling short in an area, she telephoned them or met with

them to discuss the problem. However, she contended that, since they were independent

contractors, she had no control over how they actually performed their jobs.

Ms. Chavez further testified that, post-injury, she emailed a supervisor to state that

her job duties exceeded her restrictions. The supervisor's response did not acknowledge

her restrictions. He wrote: "I have not asked you to run a route. As an OM it is YOUR

responsibility to make sure all routes are covered. If you have chosen to run them

because you failed to have a contractor run them, that was your choice." (Capitalization

in original.) He mentioned numerous staff the company already sent to help her.

In defense of Ms. Chavez's claim, Fleetgistics relied on the affidavit and live

testimony of Patrick Grum, its vice-president of operations. His affidavit stated, "Due to

multiple incidences of poor job performance over time (for example, scanning

percentages that did not meet company standards, uncorrected turnover of independent

contractors, not visiting customer sites as required), Ms. Chavez was on her third

performance improvement plan."

At the hearing, Mr. Grum testified that Fleetgistics terminated her for

performance. He said Advance Auto Parts gave Fleetgistics a "cure" notice, stating that

the company's Nashville location was "out of expectations" with its contract and might

lose its business. Mr. Grum additionally said that operations managers in other cities

performed her same duties and paid drivers the same amount hut, unlike Ms. Chavez, had

no problems meeting their job requirements. He disagreed that operations managers

have no control over independent contractors, explaining that Fleetgistics does the same

work for Advance Auto Parts in over ninety locations, and has "not lost work at this

2

magnitude because of these issues[.] The Tennessee market had many more

problems than the rest ofthe country."

Mr. Grum maintained that a good operations manager should be "out ahead of the

problems; they were proactively recruiting constantly." He denied that Fleetgistics

encouraged Ms. Chavez to run routes, and although "it happens from time to time" that

an operations manager runs a route, it was "by no means the expectation or the norm" to

do so. Mr. Grum acknowledged that the operations-manager job description required

lifting up to fifty pounds, but he said that Ms. Chavez could perform all other duties

despite her restrictions. He denied that Advance Auto Parts opening its own distribution

center affected the company's decision to terminate her.

Fleetgistics introduced two affidavits to corroborate Mr. Grum's testimony. Greg

Taylor, an operations manager in Raleigh, North Carolina, stated that he dealt with the

same rate negotiations for drivers, but the rate changes did not cause the problems Ms.

Chavez alleged. Chuck Wooley, an operations manager in Memphis, stated that

Fleetgistics let Ms. Chavez go after she failed her Performance Improvement Plans and

after it "lost a customer that represented 1.6 million dollars of revenue due to the lack of

service that Sonya [sic] Chavez provided to them."

Ms. Chavez argued that Fleetgistics terminated her because of her injury and

Advance Auto Parts' impending distribution center, which eliminated its need for

Fleetgistics' services. The company countered that it terminated her for poor

performance.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Ms. Chavez must present sufficient evidence that she is likely to prevail at a

hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(l) (2017); McCord v.

Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9

(Mar. 27, 2015).

Ms. Chavez seeks temporary partial disability benefits. Temporary partial

disability refers to the time, if any, during which the injured employee is able to resume

some gainful employment but has not reached maximum recovery. Jones v. Crencor

Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015).

However, even though an employee has a work-related injury for which temporary

benefits are payable, an employer may still enforce workplace rules. !d. at *8. Thus, a

termination due to a violation of workplace rules may relieve an employer of its

obligation to provide temporary partial disability benefits, provided the termination was

related to the workplace violation. !d. Courts must "consider the employer's need to

enforce workplace rules and the reasonableness of the contested rules." !d. at *8-9. An

employer will not be penalized for enforcing a policy if the court determines "( 1) that the

3

actions allegedly precipitating the employee's dismissal qualified as misconduct under

established or ordinary workplace rules and/or expectations; and (2) that those actions

were, as a factual matter, the true motivation for the dismissal." !d.

Here, Ms. Chavez credibly testified that she worked long hours, often running

routes when she was unable to find drivers. Ms. Wright's testimony confirmed this. The

Court does not question Ms. Chavez's commitment or general work ethic.

However, Mr. Grum also offered credible testimony-specifically that Ms. Chavez

was not meeting her job requirements and that the company attempted to address these

shortcomings before and after she suffered injury. The affidavits from Mr. Taylor and

Mr. Wooley support his testimony.

Mr. Grum explained that when Fleetgistics received the "cure" notice, it began

coaching Ms. Chavez. The Court finds Fleetgistics acted reasonably when it put the

Performance Improvement Plans in place after learning of a significant customer's

dissatisfaction and the potential loss of its business. The Court further credits Mr.

Grum's testimony that, post-injury, Ms. Chavez had the physical capabilities to perform

every aspect of her job duties except lifting more than five pounds and that the company

discouraged her from running routes. In sum, the Court finds that Ms. Chavez's failure to

meet her employer's performance expectations was the true motivation for her dismissal.

Mr. Grum denied that Advance Auto Parts' proposed distribution center played a

role in Ms. Chavez's termination, and she provided nothing but her own opinion to prove

otherwise. Moreover, the Court is not persuaded by her argument that she had no control

over independent contractors. Her role, as Mr. Grum explained, was to manage the

routes; if an independent contractor proved unsatisfactory, the remedy was to recruit

other drivers. Finally, Ms. Chavez argued that she never engaged in "misconduct"

warranting her dismissal. The Court agrees. However, this argument overlooks that

Jones also permits an employee's termination for "ordinary workplace rules and/or

expectations." An employer may reasonably expect that an employee perform her job as

described and may take appropriate action when she does not.

In conclusion, Ms. Chavez has not provided sufficient evidence from which this

Court can hold that she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits.

4

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Ms. Chavez's request for temporary disability benefits is denied at this time.

2. This case is set for a Scheduling Hearing on November 26, 2018, at 9:15 a.m.

Central Time. You must call 615-532-9552 or toll-free at 866-943-0025 to

participate in the Hearing. Failure to call may result in a determination of the

issues without your participation.

ENTERED September 25, 2018.

J DGE KENNETH M. SWITZ

Court of Workers' Compensati 1

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Ms. Chavez's Affidavit

2. Patrick Grum's Affidavit

3. Greg Taylor's Affidavit

4. Chuck Wooley's Affidavit

5. Wage statement

6. Medicalrecords

7. Causation letters

8. Email to Mr. Ford

9. Mr. Ford's email response

10. Job log

Technical record:

1. Petition for Benefit Determination

2. Employer's Pre-Mediation Position Statement

3. Dispute Certification Notice

4. Request for Expedited Hearing

5. Employer's Brief

6. Employer's Witness List

7. Employee's Brief

8. Employee's Witness List

5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was sent to these recipients by

the following methods of service on September 25, 2018.

Name Certified Via Via Service sent to:

Mail Fax Email

Julie Reasonover, X Julie@reasonoverl aw.com

Employee's attorney

Kitty Boyte, Employer' s X Kbo:tte@constagny .com;

attorney dmccorkle@constagny.,com

P nny Shr: , Clerk of Court

Court of orkers' Compensation Claims

WC.Cou rtCierk@tn.gov

6

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the

form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven

business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice

of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of

the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file

it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both

parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’

Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof

concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be

a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten

business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The

party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business

days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a

statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the

expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of

the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an

argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

Filed Date Stamp Here EXPEDITED HEARING NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Division of Workers' Compensation

Docket#: - - - -- -- - --

www.tn.go v/labor-wfd/wcomp.shtm l

State File #/YR: - - -- - - --

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

1-800-332-2667 RFA#: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ _

Date of Injury: - - - -- - - - -

SSN: _______ _ ______ __

Employee

Employer and Carrier

Notice

Noticeisg~enthat _ _ _ _ _ _ _~~--~~~~---~~~--------~

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies) on separate sheet if necessary]

appeals the order(s) of the Court of Workers' Compensation Claims at _ __

-~~~-----~~~~~~~~-to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board .

[List the date(s) the order(s) was filed in the court clerk's office]

Judge___________________________________________

Statement of the Issues

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

Additional Information

Type of Case [Check the most appropriate item]

D Temporary disability benefits

D Medical benefits for current injury

D Medical benefits under prior order issued by the Court

List of Parties

Appellant (Requesting Party): _____________ .A t Hearing: DEmployer DEmployee

Address:. _______________________ ______________ ___________

Party's Phone:.____________________________ Email: _________________________

Attorney's Name:________________________________ ___ BPR#: - - - - - - - - - - - -

Attorney's Address:. _ _ _ _ _~~-~~~~----~~---- Phone:

Attorney's City, State & Zip code: _____________________ ___________ _ _ _ __ _

Attorney's Email :_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

*Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant*

LB-1099 rev.4/15 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: - - - -- - - -- - - - SF#: _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ DO l: _ __ _ __

Aopellee(s)

Appellee (Opposing Party): _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.At Hearing: OEmployer DEmployee

Appellee's Address: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Appellee's Phone:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.Email:_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __

Attorney's Name:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ BPR#: - - - - - - - -

Attorney's Address:._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone:

Attorney's City, State & Zip code: - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -

Attorney's Email:._ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, certify that I have forwarded a true and exact copy of this

Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal by First Class, United States Mail, postage prepaid, to all parties

and/or their attorneys in this case in accordance with Rule 0800-02-22.01(2) of the Tennessee Rules of

Board of Workers' Compensation Appeals on this the day of__, 20_ .

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev.4/1S Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

.

ll .I

Tennessee Bureau of Workers' Compensation

220 French Landing Drive, 1-B

Nashville, TN 37243-1002

800-332-2667

AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY

I, , having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that

because of my poverty, I am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be

waived. The following facts support my poverty.

1. Full Name:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 2. Address: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

3. Telephone Number: - - - - - - - - - 4. Date of Birth: - - - - - - - - - - -

5. Names and Ages of All Dependents:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - --

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6. I am employed by: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , -

My employer's address is: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

My employer's phone number is: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:

$ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___

8. I receive or expect to receive money from the following sources:

AFDC $ per month beginning

SSI $ per month beginning

Retirement $ per month beginning

Disability $ per month beginning

Unemployment $ per month beginning

Worker's Camp.$ per month beginning

Other $ per month beginning

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

9. My expenses are: ' ; !•

'

Rent/House Payment $ per month Medical/Dental $ per month

Groceries $ per month Telephone $ per month

Electricity $ per month School Supplies $ per month

Water $ per month Clothing $ per month

Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month

Transportation $ per month Child Support $ per month

Car $ per month

Other $ per month (describe:

10. Assets:

Automobile $ _ _ __ _

(FMV) - - - - - -- - - -

Checking/Savings Acct. $ _ _ _ __

House $ _ _ _ __

(FMV) - - -- - - -- - -

)

Other $ _ _ _ __ Describe:_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __

11. My debts are:

Amount Owed To Whom

I hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete

and that I am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal.

APPELLANT

Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this

_ _ _ dayof _____________ ,20____

NOTARY PUBLIC

My Commission Expires:_ _ _ _ _ __ _

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.