Opinion

Touchette, Velvet v. Speedway, LLC

  • 2018 TN WC 150
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Sep 20, 2018
Status
Published
On the bench
Robert Durham
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Sep 25, 2018

01:21 PM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MURFREESBORO

Velvet Touchette, ) Docket No.: 2018-05-0417

Employee, )

v. )

)

Speedway, LLC, ) State File No.: 95598-2017

Employer, )

And )

)

Old Republic Ins. Co. )

Insurer. ) Judge Robert Durham

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING MEDICAL BENEFITS

This case came before the Court for an Expedited Hearing on September 17, 20 18.

The legal issue is whether Ms. Touchette's chest and left shoulder complaints arose

primarily out of and in the course and scope of her employment with Speedway. For the

following reasons, the Court holds she is likely to succeed at a hearing on the merits in

establishing entitlement to a panel. Because Speedway denied her claim, the Court holds

it must authorize reasonable and necessary treatment for the work injury with an

orthopedist at Seven Springs Orthopedics.

History of Claim

On December 2, 2017, Ms. Touchette worked as an assistant manager trainee for

Speedway. While restocking the coffee station, she noticed an urn was not working. 1

She began checking if one was unplugged. This included checking an outlet underneath

the coffee counter in the back of a storage cabinet by bracing herself with her left arm,

stooping down, and reaching through the open door to the back of the deep cabinet where

the outlet was located. At the hearing, Ms. Touchette stated that she reached into the

back of the cabinet, grabbed a tight plug and attempted to work it free of the outlet when

1

In her early accounts, Ms. Touchette stated she transported a heavy box to the coffee station; however, at

the hearing, she admitted that she transported the box several minutes before she experienced chest pain.

she felt a sudden, excruciating pain in the left side of her chest radiating to her left

shoulder. 2

A co-worker, Keonna Sebree, found Ms. Touchette lying on the floor, clutching

her chest in intense pain. Surveillance footage shows Ms. Sebree assisting her to the

office. Ms. Touchette's left hand was on her chest. An ambulance transported her to the

emergency room where Ms. Touchette complained of "pleuritic, sharp" chest pain

exacerbated by movement and chest palpation. The ER doctor ruled out heart problems

and diagnosed Ms. Touchette with acute costochondritis, or inflammation of the chest

wall muscles.

The next day, she completed an injury report for Speedway. Ms. Touchette wrote

she experienced sharp pain in the middle of her chest when she was "bending down and

into cabinet to check plug connection." She made no mention of pulling on a plug.

Speedway did not provide a panel of physicians.

On December 4, Ms. Touchette visited her primary care physician, Dr. Olawumi

Akatue. Ms. Touchette reported chest pain "after she had lifted some boxes and then

reached for a cabinet to pull an item," and that she still had chest pain and pain lifting her

arms. Dr. Akatue diagnosed a chest muscle strain/musculoskeletal pain and assigned

restrictions. Ms. Touchette returned a week later for an "upper ext/shoulder/chest sprain

after she did some pulling at work." Dr. Akatue noted pain to the right of the sternum

and toward both shoulders. She diagnosed a lingering muscle strain and recommended

Ms. Touchette take "a few days off work."

She returned to Dr. Akatue the next week, this time with a case manager. Ms.

Touchette stated the right-sided pain improved, but she still had pain, decreased range of

motion and occasional numbness and tingling in her left shoulder and arm. Dr. Akatue

ordered x-rays, which were negative, and made an orthopedic referral. She did not

mention work restrictions then; however, at the next visit she stated that since Ms.

Touchette told her Speedway did not have light duty, she could stay off work until she

saw an orthopedist.

Ms. Touchette testified she spoke to the adjuster for Speedway about the referral,

and he told her that she could go to any orthopedist. Speedway did not refute this. She

stated she then attempted to contact the adjuster several times to confirm scheduling, but

he did not return her calls. She did not hear from him until Speedway denied her claim.

Afterward, Ms. Touchette sought unauthorized treatment at Seven Springs

2

Ms. Touchette's testimony differs from the various written accounts of the incident that were made

before the hearing. Given the emphasis placed on this difference at the hearing, the Court believes it will

be instructive to detail the prior accounts.

2

Orthopedics. 3 Brad Bell, PA-C, noted that "per her history, she was reaching awkwardly

beneath the counter and felt something strain in the left side of her chest" with most of

the pain since migrating to her left shoulder. PA Bell noted ROM limitations and give-

way weakness due to complaints of pain in the left shoulder and left chest wall. He gave

her a steroid injection in her shoulder, recommended a left shoulder MRI and kept her off

work until after the MRI.

Following this initial visit, Ms. Touchette underwent a variety of tests and

treatments. She experienced no relief from steroid injections, pain medicine, muscle

relaxants or physical therapy. A left shoulder MRI did not provide an explanation for her

symptoms.

Ms. Touchette sought a second opinion from Charles Cassidy, PA-C with Sport

Ortho Urgent Care. She told him her injury occurred as she was reaching into a cabinet

with her right arm with her left arm resting in a flexed, abducted position on the counter.

A chest MRI and a cardiology work-up did not reveal any problems. Ms. Touchette then

saw a neurologist and underwent a nerve conduction study of her left arm, which also did

not show any abnormalities that might explain her pain.

Ms. Touchette filed a Petition for Benefit Determination (PBD) with the Bureau

on April 18. In the attached, hand-written affidavit, she described the December 2

incident, stating she felt intense pain when she "opened the cabinet door, bent down with

my left hand on the (blank) and started to reach into the cabinet with my right."

Afterward, Speedway authorized an orthopedic evaluation with Dr. Joseph Weick.

Ms. Touchette stated her pain began as "she was reaching under a desk with her right

hand while she had her left hand holding a table top." He reported his examination was

frustrated by Ms. Touchette's refusal to move her left arm due to pain complaints. Dr.

Weick concluded there was nothing more to offer her and placed her at maximum

medical improvement with a three-percent impairment to the upper extremity due to

shoulder pain.

Ms. Touchette testified she still has excruciating pain that radiates from the left

side of her chest to her left shoulder any time she moves her left arm. She stated the pain

is sometimes so severe it causes her to vomit. She asserted she did not have any

problems with her left shoulder or chest before December 2, 2017. She returned to Seven

Springs following Dr. Weick's evaluation, and PA Bell recommended a shoulder MRI

with contrast.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

3

Ms. Touchette has only seen physician's assistants at Seven Springs, although orthopedists signed the

records.

3

Ms. Touchette does not have to prove every element of her claim by a

preponderance of the evidence to obtain relief at an expedited hearing. Instead, she must

present sufficient evidence that she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See

Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(l) (2017); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing,

2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

Before turning to the merits of Ms. Touchette's claim, the Court must first address

her credibility as to her testimony about the December 2 incident. She testified that she

felt intense pain in her chest after reaching to the back of the cabinet and pulling a tight

plug from its outlet. Perhaps this was in response to Speedway's assertion that an injury

caused by mere reaching is idiopathic. In contrast, at least five written statements, two of

which are in Ms. Touchette's own handwriting, provided different accounts. With minor

variations, the written statements indicated that Ms. Touchette's pain began while

bending down and reaching toward the back of the cabinet with her right arm while her

left arm was braced on top of the counter. None mentioned that she felt pain only after

pulling on a tight plug, even though some, like her affidavit, were very detailed.

Ms. Touchette attempted to explain this inconsistency, but her explanations are

unpersuasive. Given the overwhelming weight of contrary evidence, the Court finds that

her testimony about her pain starting when she was pulling on a plug is not credible, and

that the incident occurred as recorded in the written accounts. Further, the Court finds

Ms. Touchette's lack of credibility to be troubling. By demonstrating a willingness to

change her story in an attempt to avoid Speedway's defense, she makes all of her

testimony suspect. The Court strongly admonishes her against doing so again.

Nevertheless, the written accounts contain sufficient detail to allow the Court to consider

her claim based on them. See Lewis v. Molly Maid, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

LEXIS 19, at *8 (Apr. 20, 2016) (trial court did not err in ruling in favor of employee,

despite questions regarding employee's credibility, when other evidence supported

employee's position.).

The primary issue here is causation. To prevail, Ms. Touchette must establish she

is likely to prove she suffered an accidental injury that was "caused by a specific incident,

or set of incidents, arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment,

and is identifiable by time and place of occurrence." Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-

102(14)(A). No one disputes that her pain began in the course and scope of her

employment with Speedway. However, she must also establish that her complaints arose

primarily out of her employment. On this point, Speedway argued Ms. Touchette's claim

must fail because her injury is idiopathic.

"An idiopathic injury is one that has an unexplained origin or cause, and generally

does not arise out of the employment unless some condition of the employment presents a

peculiar or additional hazard." McCaffery v. Cardinal Logistics, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp.

4

App. Bd. LEXIS 50, at *9 (Dec. 10, 20 15) (citations omitted). An idiopathic injury is

only compensable if the "accident originated in the hazards to which the employee was

exposed as a result of performing his job duties." !d. at *10. Speedway argued that,

much like rising from a squatting position, simply reaching out does not constitute a

condition of employment presenting a peculiar or additional hazard. See Willis v. All

Staff, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd., LEXIS 42, at *18 (Nov. 9, 2015)(employee who

injured his knee while rising from a squatting position did not suffer a compensable

injury.).

An injury caused by reaching out one's arm might constitute an idiopathic injury

under certain circumstances; however, the Court finds that is not the case here. Ms.

Touchette was not simply reaching out; she was bent over a low cabinet, her left hand

bracing her body on the counter while she stretched toward the back of the cabinet with

her right hand to reach an outlet. Her body was in an extremely awkward position while

performing her job by checking the outlets. Thus, the Court holds that Ms. Touchette's

December 2 injury arose out of a "peculiar or additional hazard" of her employment and

was not idiopathic.

The Court also disagrees with Speedway's argument that it should be excused

from providing medical care because Ms. Touchette's tests were negative. According to

her unrefuted testimony, she currently treats with Seven Stones Orthopedics, which

recommended a left shoulder MRI with contrast. The fact that no doctor discovered the

source of Ms. Touchette's complaints does not eliminate her need for treatment or

Speedway's obligation to provide it.

However, the Court agrees with Speedway that Ms. Touchette has yet to show she

is likely to prove causation, given that there is no medical opinion on this issue. To

establish causation, a physician must give an opinion that states "to a reasonable degree

of medical certainty that [the injury] contributed more than fifty percent (50%) in causing

the death, disablement or need for medical treatment, considering all causes." Tenn.

Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(C).

At this time, Ms. Touchette has not introduced a doctor's opinion providing

medical causation for her current complaints or that establishes that her medical expenses

were reasonable and necessary for treatment of her work-related injury. Further, she has

not submitted any medical evidence establishing that a work-related injury left her

temporarily disabled. However, this does not excuse Speedway from its obligation to

provide an authorized physician to determine if Ms. Touchette sustained il compensable

injury that requires treatment. The Court holds that while Ms. Touchette has yet to prove

she is likely to prevail in establishing compensability, she has shown she is likely to

prove entitlement to a panel for her asserted injury. See Lewis, at *9.

However, rather than provide a panel of physicians as required by Tennessee Code

5

25

25,

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the

form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven

business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice

of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of

the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file

it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both

parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’

Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof

concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be

a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten

business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The

party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business

days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a

statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the

expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of

the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an

argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

Filed Date Stamp Here EXPEDITED HEARING NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Division of Workers' Compensation

Docket#: - - - -- -- - --

www.tn.go v/labor-wfd/wcomp.shtm l

State File #/YR: - - -- - - --

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

1-800-332-2667 RFA#: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ _

Date of Injury: - - - -- - - - -

SSN: _______ _ ______ __

Employee

Employer and Carrier

Notice

Noticeisg~enthat _ _ _ _ _ _ _~~--~~~~---~~~--------~

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies) on separate sheet if necessary]

appeals the order(s) of the Court of Workers' Compensation Claims at _ __

-~~~-----~~~~~~~~-to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board .

[List the date(s) the order(s) was filed in the court clerk's office]

Judge___________________________________________

Statement of the Issues

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

Additional Information

Type of Case [Check the most appropriate item]

D Temporary disability benefits

D Medical benefits for current injury

D Medical benefits under prior order issued by the Court

List of Parties

Appellant (Requesting Party): _____________ .A t Hearing: DEmployer DEmployee

Address:. _______________________ ______________ ___________

Party's Phone:.____________________________ Email: _________________________

Attorney's Name:________________________________ ___ BPR#: - - - - - - - - - - - -

Attorney's Address:. _ _ _ _ _~~-~~~~----~~---- Phone:

Attorney's City, State & Zip code: _____________________ ___________ _ _ _ __ _

Attorney's Email :_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

*Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant*

LB-1099 rev.4/15 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: - - - -- - - -- - - - SF#: _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ DO l: _ __ _ __

Aopellee(s)

Appellee (Opposing Party): _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.At Hearing: OEmployer DEmployee

Appellee's Address: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Appellee's Phone:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.Email:_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __

Attorney's Name:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ BPR#: - - - - - - - -

Attorney's Address:._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone:

Attorney's City, State & Zip code: - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -

Attorney's Email:._ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, certify that I have forwarded a true and exact copy of this

Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal by First Class, United States Mail, postage prepaid, to all parties

and/or their attorneys in this case in accordance with Rule 0800-02-22.01(2) of the Tennessee Rules of

Board of Workers' Compensation Appeals on this the day of__, 20_ .

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev.4/1S Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

.

ll .I

Tennessee Bureau of Workers' Compensation

220 French Landing Drive, 1-B

Nashville, TN 37243-1002

800-332-2667

AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY

I, , having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that

because of my poverty, I am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be

waived. The following facts support my poverty.

1. Full Name:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 2. Address: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

3. Telephone Number: - - - - - - - - - 4. Date of Birth: - - - - - - - - - - -

5. Names and Ages of All Dependents:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - --

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6. I am employed by: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , -

My employer's address is: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

My employer's phone number is: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:

$ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___

8. I receive or expect to receive money from the following sources:

AFDC $ per month beginning

SSI $ per month beginning

Retirement $ per month beginning

Disability $ per month beginning

Unemployment $ per month beginning

Worker's Camp.$ per month beginning

Other $ per month beginning

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

9. My expenses are: ' ; !•

'

Rent/House Payment $ per month Medical/Dental $ per month

Groceries $ per month Telephone $ per month

Electricity $ per month School Supplies $ per month

Water $ per month Clothing $ per month

Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month

Transportation $ per month Child Support $ per month

Car $ per month

Other $ per month (describe:

10. Assets:

Automobile $ _ _ __ _

(FMV) - - - - - -- - - -

Checking/Savings Acct. $ _ _ _ __

House $ _ _ _ __

(FMV) - - -- - - -- - -

)

Other $ _ _ _ __ Describe:_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __

11. My debts are:

Amount Owed To Whom

I hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete

and that I am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal.

APPELLANT

Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this

_ _ _ dayof _____________ ,20____

NOTARY PUBLIC

My Commission Expires:_ _ _ _ _ __ _

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.