Opinion

Blake, Jean v. Hendrickson USA, LLC

  • 2018 TN WC 100
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Jul 6, 2018
Status
Published
On the bench
Joshua Davis Baker
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Jul 06, 2018

10:58 AM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT NASHVILLE

JEAN BLAKE, ) Docket No. 2017-06-0671

Employee, )

v. )

HENDRICKSON USA, LLC, ) State File No. 96077-2016

Employer, )

And )

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ) Judge Joshua Davis Baker

Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING

MEDICAL BENEFITS

The Court convened an expedited hearing on June 27, 2018, to determine whether

the employer, Hendrickson USA, LLC, should be required to provide Ms. Blake

additional medical treatment under the open medicals clause of a prior settlement.

Though the settlement guarantees her open medical benefits, the Court denies her request

for additional medical treatment at this time.

History of Claim

This Court approved a settlement agreement in June 2017 between Ms. Blake and

Hendrickson for a February 3, 2016 work injury involving her right shoulder and neck.

In the agreement, Ms. Blake retained the right to continued medical treatment for

“reasonable and necessary authorized future medical expenses which are directly related

to the subject injury.”

In early October 2017, Ms. Blake returned to her authorized physician, Dr. Kurtis

Kowalski, complaining of right shoulder pain. Dr. Kowalski concluded her shoulder

symptoms were “likely coming down from the neck.” He assessed “persistent right

shoulder pain, probable radicular findings from the cervical spine and cubital tunnel

syndrome.” He further noted that “[one] of her biggest issues right now is the numbness

and tingling down the ulnar aspect of the right hand” but mentioned that this condition

was unrelated to her present workers’ compensation claim. He also recommended “an

1

independent medical examination for a second opinion on both the shoulder and for

causation of the elbow.” Hendrickson did not provide a second opinion.

Ms. Blake filed a Petition for Benefit Determination (PBD) under the open

medicals clause of her settlement agreement. In the PBD, she requested “an independent

medical exam for shoulder and [concerning] causation [of her] right elbow.” Although

not a part of the settlement, Ms. Blake also described “nerve to elbow and carpal tunnel

syndrome” in addition to her neck and right shoulder injuries as conditions that arose

from the accident.

After Ms. Blake filed her petition, Hendrickson sent Dr. Kowalski a letter seeking

clarification of his diagnosis and recommendations. In his response, Dr. Kowalski

confirmed Ms. Blake received all medical care necessary for her right shoulder injury.

He also acknowledged telling Ms. Blake that he believed her ulnar neuropathy was

unrelated to her work injury and suggested she seek an independent medical examination

if she disagreed with his opinion.

Dr. Kowalski deferred to Dr. Christopher Ashley concerning the completeness of

treatment for Ms. Blake’s neck injury. Dr. Ashley recommended cervical diagnostic

facet joint injections to “better understand if this is the origin of her pain and if she may

benefit from some further treatment.” Ms. Blake testified she had the facet injections and

presented no records indicating Dr. Ashley recommended further treatment for her neck.

Teresa Wilson, a claims representative, testified by affidavit that she was “unaware of

any pending or recommended medical care for Ms. Blake.”

Ms. Blake filed an affidavit where she indicated her treating physician had no

further treatment to offer for her workplace injury. Because of this indication, Ms. Blake

included an alternate request for relief: monetary payment to close medical treatment for

her right shoulder.

At the hearing, Ms. Blake requested treatment under a “new claim” for “carpal

tunnel syndrome.” She also asked that Hendrickson either pay her for closure of future

medical treatment or provide additional treatment for her neck and right shoulder.

Hendrickson argued Ms. Blake’s “cubital tunnel syndrome” is unrelated to her work

injuries and that authorized physicians have not recommended any treatment that

Hendrickson has not provided for her work-related injuries.1

1

The parties and the physicians used the terms carpal tunnel, cubital tunnel, and ulnar neuropathy to

describe Ms. Blake’s condition. Although the Court believes the terms were used to describe one

condition, the Court cannot definitely determine this from the record. In any event, as none of the

conditions was the subject of the settlement of Ms. Blake’s workplace injury, the lack of clarity in use of

the terms does not affect the outcome here.

2

Legal Principles and Analysis

Ms. Blake has the burden of proof but need not prove every element of her claim

by a preponderance of the evidence to receive relief at an expedited hearing. Instead, she

must present sufficient evidence showing she would likely to prevail at a hearing on the

merits. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). The Court holds she failed to carry her burden.

Hendrickson is required to provide “medical and surgical treatment . . . as ordered

by the attending physician . . . made reasonably necessary by accident” because Ms.

Blake retained her right to future medical treatment in her settlement agreement. Tenn.

Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(1)(A). This Court has authority “to order the employer or the

employer’s insurer to provide specific medical care and treatment, medical services or

medical benefits, or both, to the employee pursuant to a . . . workers’ compensation

settlement agreement[.]” Id. at § 50-6-204 (g)(2)(B). However, the authority to order

further medical treatment does not include authority to require Hendrickson to purchase

Ms. Blake’s right to future medical treatment. The Court can, however, require

Hendrickson to provide future reasonable and necessary medical treatment. To require

the provision of further treatment, the Court must examine whether Ms. Blake’s attending

physicians ordered any treatment “made reasonably necessary” by her February 3, 2016

workplace injury. The Court finds that they did not.

In his opinion letter, Dr. Kowalski affirmed Ms. Blake received all medical care

appropriate for her shoulder injury. Additionally, he said Ms. Blake’s ulnar neuropathy is

unrelated to her work injuries. While Dr. Kowalski directed Ms. Blake to seek treatment

for the condition, his recommendation was unrelated to treatment for her injuries under

the settlement agreement. Lastly, Dr. Kowalski deferred to Dr. Ashley’s opinion

concerning the need for additional neck treatment, and Ms. Blake presented no evidence

indicating Hendrickson denied any treatment recommended by Dr. Ashley. The Court,

therefore, finds that Ms. Blake is unlikely to prevail at a hearing on the merits in proving

entitlement to additional medical treatment.

The Court also finds that Ms. Blake filed a claim for treatment under the open-

medicals clause of her settlement agreement rather than a new claim for benefits. The

Court understands Ms. Blake’s argument that employment as a welder for Hendrickson

caused her “cubital tunnel syndrome.” However, the question currently before the Court

is only whether treatment for the cubital tunnel syndrome is covered under the prior

settlement agreement. The Court holds the settlement does not cover treatment for the

condition. However, this holding does not prevent Ms. Blake from filing a new claim

seeking benefits for cubital tunnel syndrome.

3

It is ORDERED as follows:

1. Ms. Blake’s request for medical benefits is denied at this time.

2. The Court sets this claim for a status conference on September 10, 2018, at

9:30 a.m. (CDT). The Court will convene the status conference via telephone.

The parties must call the Court’s conference line at (615) 741-2113 or (855)

874-0474 to participate.

ENTERED ON JULY 6, 2018.

______________________________________

Judge Joshua Davis Baker

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

4

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Affidavits of Jean Blake filed March 19, 2018 and March 28, 2018

2. Medical Records

3. Opinion Letter of Dr. Kurtis Kowalski

4. Order Approving Workers’ Compensation Settlement Agreement and Workers’

Compensation Settlement Agreement entered June 6, 2017

5. Affidavit of Teresa Wilson

6. Petition for Benefit Determination filed October 30, 2017

Technical Record:

1. Petition for Benefit Determination

2. Dispute Certification Notice

3. Requests for Expedited Hearing

4. Employer’s Prehearing Brief/Statement

5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of this Expedited Hearing Order was sent to

the following recipients by the following methods of service on July 6th

___, 2018

Name Certified Fax Email Service sent to:

Mail

Jean Blake, X Jean_blake@yahoo.com

Self-represented

Employee

Blakeley D. Matthews, X bdmatthews@cclawtn.com

Employer’s Attorney

______________________________________

PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

6

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the

form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven

business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice

of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of

the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file

it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both

parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’

Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof

concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be

a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten

business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The

party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business

days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a

statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the

expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of

the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an

argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

Filed Date Stamp Here EXPEDITED HEARING NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Division of Workers' Compensation

Docket#: - - - -- -- - --

www.tn.go v/labor-wfd/wcomp.shtm l

State File #/YR: - - -- - - --

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

1-800-332-2667 RFA#: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ _

Date of Injury: - - - -- - - - -

SSN: _______ _ ______ __

Employee

Employer and Carrier

Notice

Noticeisg~enthat _ _ _ _ _ _ _~~--~~~~---~~~--------~

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies) on separate sheet if necessary]

appeals the order(s) of the Court of Workers' Compensation Claims at _ __

-~~~-----~~~~~~~~-to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board .

[List the date(s) the order(s) was filed in the court clerk's office]

Judge___________________________________________

Statement of the Issues

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

Additional Information

Type of Case [Check the most appropriate item]

D Temporary disability benefits

D Medical benefits for current injury

D Medical benefits under prior order issued by the Court

List of Parties

Appellant (Requesting Party): _____________ .A t Hearing: DEmployer DEmployee

Address:. _______________________ ______________ ___________

Party's Phone:.____________________________ Email: _________________________

Attorney's Name:________________________________ ___ BPR#: - - - - - - - - - - - -

Attorney's Address:. _ _ _ _ _~~-~~~~----~~---- Phone:

Attorney's City, State & Zip code: _____________________ ___________ _ _ _ __ _

Attorney's Email :_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

*Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant*

LB-1099 rev.4/15 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: - - - -- - - -- - - - SF#: _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ DO l: _ __ _ __

Aopellee(s)

Appellee (Opposing Party): _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.At Hearing: OEmployer DEmployee

Appellee's Address: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Appellee's Phone:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.Email:_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __

Attorney's Name:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ BPR#: - - - - - - - -

Attorney's Address:._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone:

Attorney's City, State & Zip code: - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -

Attorney's Email:._ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, certify that I have forwarded a true and exact copy of this

Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal by First Class, United States Mail, postage prepaid, to all parties

and/or their attorneys in this case in accordance with Rule 0800-02-22.01(2) of the Tennessee Rules of

Board of Workers' Compensation Appeals on this the day of__, 20_ .

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev.4/1S Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

.

ll .I

Tennessee Bureau of Workers' Compensation

220 French Landing Drive, 1-B

Nashville, TN 37243-1002

800-332-2667

AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY

I, , having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that

because of my poverty, I am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be

waived. The following facts support my poverty.

1. Full Name:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 2. Address: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

3. Telephone Number: - - - - - - - - - 4. Date of Birth: - - - - - - - - - - -

5. Names and Ages of All Dependents:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - --

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6. I am employed by: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , -

My employer's address is: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

My employer's phone number is: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:

$ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___

8. I receive or expect to receive money from the following sources:

AFDC $ per month beginning

SSI $ per month beginning

Retirement $ per month beginning

Disability $ per month beginning

Unemployment $ per month beginning

Worker's Camp.$ per month beginning

Other $ per month beginning

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

9. My expenses are: ' ; !•

'

Rent/House Payment $ per month Medical/Dental $ per month

Groceries $ per month Telephone $ per month

Electricity $ per month School Supplies $ per month

Water $ per month Clothing $ per month

Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month

Transportation $ per month Child Support $ per month

Car $ per month

Other $ per month (describe:

10. Assets:

Automobile $ _ _ __ _

(FMV) - - - - - -- - - -

Checking/Savings Acct. $ _ _ _ __

House $ _ _ _ __

(FMV) - - -- - - -- - -

)

Other $ _ _ _ __ Describe:_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __

11. My debts are:

Amount Owed To Whom

I hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete

and that I am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal.

APPELLANT

Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this

_ _ _ dayof _____________ ,20____

NOTARY PUBLIC

My Commission Expires:_ _ _ _ _ __ _

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.