The opinion
FILED
Mar 05, 2018
03:11 PM(CT)
TENNESSEE COURT OF
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
CLAIM
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS
AT MEMPHIS
LANDON JOHNSON, ) Docket No. 2017-08-0367
Employee, )
v. )
LOOMIS ARMORED, ) State File No. 94100-2016
Employer, )
And )
ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE CO., ) Judge Amber E. Luttrell
Carrier. )
EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING REQUESTED BENEFITS
This matter came before the Court on February 22, 20 18, for an Expedited
Hearing on Mr. Johnson's request for medical and temporary disability benefits for his
alleged back and neck injuries. The central legal issue is whether he is likely to establish
at a hearing on the merits that he suffered an injury to his back and neck arising primarily
out of and in the course and scope of his employment. For the reasons set forth below, the
Court holds he is not and denies the requested benefits at this time.
History of Claim 1
Mr. Johnson worked for Loomis Armored as an armed guard. He delivered money
to and from banks, which required him to load and unload carts of coins and bills. On
December 5, 2016, Mr. Johnson pushed a heavy cart of coins and experienced a sharp
pain in his low back extending down his legs. He stated the pain was bearable at first, so
he finished his shift; however, his pain increased significantly the next morning, and he
reported his injury to his supervisor. Mr. Johnson completed an Employee Incident
Statement, and Loomis authorized an appointment at Baptist Minor Medical.
1
The hearing testimony and exhibits established the facts set forth in the History of Claim section.
1
Medical Treatment
Mr. Johnson saw Nurse Practitioner Kathy Banks at Baptist Minor Medical and
complained of acute back pain radiating to his left thigh following his work injury. She
diagnosed acute back pain with sciatica, assigned restrictions, and referred Mr. Johnson
to an orthopedic specialist.
Loomis provided a panel of neurosurgeons, and he selected Dr. Federoon
Parsioon. Mr. Johnson saw Dr. Parsioon twice, provided a history of his December 5
work injury, and complained of ongoing back and lower extremity pain. Mr. Johnson also
reported a history of prior back injuries from 2009 and 2015. Dr. Parsioon noted Mr.
Johnson still had back pain resulting from his 2009 injury. He further noted Mr. Johnson
developed right lower extremity pain and leg cramps in 2015, and he treated with Dr.
Samuel Schroerlucke, who performed surgery at the L4/5 level in May 2015.
Dr. Parsioon reviewed extensive records from Mr. Johnson's prior back treatment
and summarized the history in his record. He noted Mr. Johnson improved following his
2015 surgery until he returned to Dr. Schroerlucke on November 11, 2016, and
complained of neck pain, low back pain, and bilateral lower extremity pain. Mr. Johnson
commented to Dr. Schroerlucke that he did not think he could continue doing his job. Dr.
Schroerlucke ordered an MRI, which Mr. Johnson's personal health insurance denied.
Dr. Parsioon noted Mr. Johnson's complaints to him following his December 5,
2016 work injury were the same as those reported to Dr. Schroerlucke one month before
the injury. He ordered an MRI of Mr. Johnson's lumbar spine and restricted him from
work. 2
Following the MRI, Mr. Johnson returned to Dr. Parsioon. Dr. Parsioon noted it
showed a small diffuse disc bulge at L3/4 without herniation, post-operative changes on
L4/5, and facet arthropathy with minimal disc bulge at L5/S1 with left foramina! stenosis.
He compared this study to Mr. Johnson's 2015 MRI and concluded,
The lifting at work has not caused any anatomical changes in his spine and
the findings of this new MRI are exactly the same findings at L5/S 1 that
were present in 20 15. I discussed this with him and I told him that because
he had the same problems in his back and left lower extremity with positive
straight leg raising test on November 11, 2016, which is before his date of
injury, I do not believe that this problem is related to his work injury.
Dr. Parsioon indicated that Mr. Johnson did not need any further neurosurgical
2
The parties agreed Loomis paid Mr. Johnson temporary total disability benefits through December 29,
2016, totaling $2,119.71.
2
intervention at that time, released him at maximum medical improvement, and assigned a
zero-percent permanent impairment rating. Based on Dr. Parsioon's opinion, Loomis
denied further medical and temporary disability benefits.
Mr. Johnson sought unauthorized treatment with Dr. Ben Andrews at Christ
Community Health Services in 2017 for his back and neck complaints. He gave Dr.
Andrews a history that his back complaints began in August 2016, and his neck
complaints began in November 2016. He did not associate either condition with his
December 5, 2016 work injury. Mr. Johnson later sought treatment with Dr. Andrews in
October 2017 following a motor vehicle accident. He described the accident to Dr.
Andrews and complained of increased neck pain. Dr. Andrews treated him for cervicalgia
and cervical radiculopathy secondary to degenerative joint disease.
Hearing Testimony
Mr. Johnson testified that he continues to treat for his back at MedPlex Ortho and
with a physician from Dallas who travels to Memphis. He requested medical treatment
through workers' compensation and stated he needs surgery.
On cross-examination, Mr. Johnson acknowledged he returned to Dr. Schroerlucke
in November 2016 for symptoms in his back and numbness in his legs and feet that began
in September 2016. Mr. Johnson agreed he has a longstanding history of low back
problems dating back to at least 2003. He testified he injured his back at Loomis in 2003
and 2009. He later injured his back again at home in 20 15 while reaching out of a bathtub
for a towel.
Concerning his neck, Mr. Johnson acknowledged he did not report any neck
complaints to NP Banks on December 6, 2016, following his work injury. He stated the
neck symptoms did not begin until one week after the injury. He further acknowledged
"flare-ups" in his neck and arms before his work injury.
Deidra Joseph, Mr. Johnson's fiancee, testified that she accompanied Mr. Johnson
to his appointments with Dr. Parsioon. She stated they waited close to two hours in the
waiting room for the appointments, and Dr. Parsioon's examinations of Mr. Joseph lasted
approximately five minutes. She and Mr. Johnson expressed dissatisfaction with Dr.
Parsioon's treatment and demeanor.
Thomas Christian, Loomis' workers' compensation insurance adjuster, testified by
affidavit. He took Mr. Johnson's recorded statement the day after he reported his work
injury. Mr. Christian asserted Mr. Johnson reported pain in his legs, hip, buttocks, and
numbness in both calves following the injury. He never reported any pain or problems in
his neck to Mr. Christian.
3
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
i Because this is an Expedited Hearing, Mr. Johnson need not prove every element
of his claim by a preponderance of the evidence in order to obtain relief. Instead, he must
present sufficient evidence from which this court might determine he is likely to prevail
at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(l) (2017).
To prove a compensable injury, Mr. Johnson must prove "to a reasonable degree
of medical certainty that [the injury] contributed more than fifty percent (50%) in causing
the death, disablement or need for medical treatment, considering all causes." See Tenn.
Code Ann.§ 50-6-102(14)(B). The term "reasonable degree of medical certainty" means
that "in the opinion of the physician, it is more likely than not considering all causes, as
opposed to speculation or possibility." See Tenn. Code Ann. §50-6-102(14)(D). Thus,
causation must be established by expert medical testimony.
The Court first notes that Loomis did not dispute that Mr. Johnson sustained an
injury on December 5, 2016, or that he timely reported the injury. The Court finds Mr.
Johnson's testimony credible regarding the work incident and the back pain that followed
and holds he came forward with sufficient evidence to establish an incident identifiable
by time and place of occurrence. The question is whether he appears likely to prove at a
hearing on the merits that the incident is the primary cause of his back and neck
conditions and need for medical treatment. Applying the previous principles to the facts
of this case, the Court cannot find that Mr. Johnson is likely to meet this burden at this
time.
Concerning his back condition, the sole proof addressing medical causation came
from Dr. Parsioon, the panel-selected treating physician. Dr. Parsioon concluded Mr.
Johnson's work injury did not cause any anatomic change in his spine after comparing
Mr. Johnson's post-injury MRI to his 2015 MRI and reviewing Dr. Schroerlucke's
November 2016 record. He stated, "I do not believe that this problem is related to his
work injury."
The Court recognizes that Mr. Johnson disputed Dr. Parsioon's conclusion;
however, Mr. Johnson's disagreement with the physician's opinion, while genuine, is
legally insufficient to refute Dr. Parsioon's opinion. Concerning the employee's burden
to produce medical proof, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board held:
In cases ... where an employer has presented expert medical proof that the
employee's condition is not work-related, the employee must present expert
medical proof that the alleged injury is causally related to the employment
when the case is not "obvious, simple [or] routine." While lay testimony
may be probative on the issue of causation, it is insufficient to meet an
employee's burden of proof in the absence of medical evidence.
4
Berdnik v. Fairfield Glade Cmty. Club, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 32, at *10
(May 18, 20 17) (internal citations omitted).
Here, the only expert medical opinion addressing causation for the back condition
is contrary to Mr. Johnson's position. Absent countervailing medical proof, the Court
holds Mr. Johnson is not likely to prevail at trial in establishing his work injury is the
primary cause of his back condition and need for medical treatment.
Turning to his neck condition, the Court finds Mr. Johnson did not present any
evidence to support his claim of a neck injury arising out of his December 5 incident.
Mr. Johnson did not report any neck complaints in the accident report or in his recorded
statement to Mr. Christian following the accident. He did not complain of any neck
symptoms to NP Banks or Dr. Parsioon. The only medical records introduced into
evidence that mention Mr. Johnson's neck are from Dr. Schroerlucke and Dr. Andrews.
Those records indicated Mr. Johnson saw Dr. Schroerlucke one month before his work
injury with neck symptoms. He also reported to Dr. Andrews in 2017 that his neck
problems began in November 2016, before the December 5 work injury and he made no
mention of his work injury. At later visits, he complained of neck pain following a motor
vehicle accident. Without any supporting proof, the Court holds Mr. Johnson is not likely
to prevail at trial in establishing his work injury is the primary cause of his neck
condition.
In summary, the Court holds Mr. Johnson did not come forward with sufficient
proof, at this interlocutory stage, to show a likelihood of success at trial. Thus, his request
for medical and temporary disability benefits is denied.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:
1. Mr. Johnson's claim against Loomis Armored and its workers' compensation
carrier for the requested medical benefits and temporary total disability 'benefits is
denied at this time.
2. This matter is set for a telephonic Status Hearing on April 23, 2018, at 10:30 a.m.
Central Time. The parties must call toll-free 855-543-5039 to participate in the
hearing.
ENTERED March 5, 2018.
~ k~~
JugeAIBb'er E. Luttrel
Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
5
APPENDIX
Exhibits:
1. Notice of Controversy
2. Wage Statement
3. Landon Johnson Affidavit
4. Makeva Jeffries Affidavit
5. Thomas Christian Affidavit
6. Medical Records Compilation (collective exhibit)
7. Baptist Minor Medical Work Status-July 14, 2009
8. Regional One Health record-August 20, 2017
9. Dr. Woodall record-February 27, 2015
10.Family Physician's Group record-August 13, 2010
1l.MRI-November 16,2017
12.Dr. Parsioon's work status note
13. Photos (collective exhibit)
14. Employee Incident Report
15. Panel
Technical record:
1. Petition for Benefit Determination
2. Dispute Certification Notice
3. Request for Expedited Hearing
4. Motion for Leave to Depose Employee
5. Order Granting Motion for Leave to Depose Employee and Setting Expedited
Hearing
6. Employee's pre-hearing statement
7. Motion to Dismiss Employee's Request for Expedited Hearing
8. Employer's pre-hearing brief
9. Order Denying Motion to Dismiss Expedited Hearing Request
6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a true and correct copy of this Expedited Hearing Order was sent to
the following recipients by the following methods of service on March 5, 2018.
Name First Class Via Service sent to:
Mail Email
Landon Johnson, X X landon.j ohnson@ymail.com
Self-represented Employee 4041 Barron Ave.
Memphis, TN 3 8111
Dale Thomas, Esq., X dthomas@raineykizer.com
Employer's Attorney
7
Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:
If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’
Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:
1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the
form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven
business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice
of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.
2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten
calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at
any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the
alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s
website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-
completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of
Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will
result in dismissal of the appeal.
3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request
from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of
the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file
it with the court clerk within ten calendar days of the filing the Notice of
Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both
parties within ten calendar days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of
the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’
Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the
Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof
concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be
a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.
4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within five
business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The
party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within five business
days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a
statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the
expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of
the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an
argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.
For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.
Filed Date Stamp Here EXPEDITED HEARING NOTICE OF APPEAL Docket #: _______________________
Tennessee Division of Workers’ Compensation
www.tn.gov/labor-wfd/wcomp.shtml State File #/YR: __________________
wc.courtclerk@tn.gov
1-800-332-2667 RFA #: __________________________
Date of Injury: ___________________
SSN: ___________________________
Employee
Employer and Carrier
Notice
Notice is given that
[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies) on separate sheet if necessary]
appeals the order(s) of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims at ______
to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.
[List the date(s) the order(s) was filed in the court clerk’s office]
Judge
Statement of the Issues
Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:
Additional Information
Type of Case [Check the most appropriate item]
☐ Temporary disability benefits
☐ Medical benefits for current injury
☐ Medical benefits under prior order issued by the Court
List of Parties
Appellant (Requesting Party): ___At Hearing: ☐Employer ☐Employee
Address:
Party’s Phone: Email:
Attorney’s Name: BPR#:
Attorney’s Address: Phone:
Attorney’s City, State & Zip code:
Attorney’s Email:
* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *
LB-1099 rev.4/15 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082
Employee Name: ____________________________________ SF#: ________________________________ DOI: __________________
Appellee(s)
Appellee (Opposing Party):____________________At Hearing: ☐Employer ☐Employee
Appellee’s Address: ____
Appellee’s Phone: Email: ____
Attorney’s Name: BPR#: _
Attorney’s Address: Phone: _
Attorney’s City, State & Zip code: __________________ _________ ______
Attorney’s Email: _
* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, , certify that I have forwarded a true and exact copy of this
Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal by First Class, United States Mail, postage prepaid, to all parties
and/or their attorneys in this case in accordance with Rule 0800-02-22.01(2) of the Tennessee Rules of
Board of Workers’ Compensation Appeals on this the ___day of , 20__.
[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]
LB-1099 rev.4/15 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082
Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation
220 French Landing Drive, I-B
Nashville, TN 37243-1002
800-332-2667
AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY
I, ________________________________________, having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that
because of my poverty, I am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be
waived. The following facts support my poverty.
1. Full Name: 2. Address:
3. Telephone Number: 4. Date of Birth:
5. Names and Ages of All Dependents:
______________________________________ Relationship:
______________________________________ Relationship:
______________________________________ Relationship:
______________________________________ Relationship:
6. I am employed by:
My employer’s address is:
My employer’s phone number is:
7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:
$ ___________________
8. I receive or expect to receive money from the following sources:
AFDC $ ________ per month beginning
SSI $ ________ per month beginning
Retirement $ ________ per month beginning
Disability $ ________ per month beginning
Unemployment $ ________ per month beginning
Worker’s Comp.$ ________ per month beginning
Other $ ________ per month beginning
LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082
9. My expenses are:
Rent/House Payment $ ________ per month Medical/Dental $ ___________ per month
Groceries $ ________ per month Telephone $ per month
Electricity $ ________ per month School Supplies $ per month
Water $ ________ per month Clothing $ per month
Gas $ ________ per month Child Care $ per month
Transportation $ ________ per month Child Support $ per month
Car $_________ per month
Other $ _______ per month (describe: )
10. Assets:
Automobile $ (FMV)
Checking/Savings Acct. $
House $ (FMV)
Other $ Describe:
11. My debts are:
Amount Owed To Whom
I hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete
and that I am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal.
_
APPELLANT
Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this
_______ day of , 20_______.
NOTARY PUBLIC
My Commission Expires:
LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082
6t+O
State of Tennessee
Bureau of Workers' Compensation
220 French Landing Drive, Suite 1-B
Nashville, Tennessee 37243-1 002
Landon Johnson
4041 Barron Ave.
Memphis, TN 3 8111